CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 décembre 2009

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4B480138 { width:266.49pt; display:inline-block } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s101D1369 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:11.4pt; text-align:justify } .s673A384F { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify }   15 December 2009   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 27224/09 by Adam OSTROWSKI against Poland lodged on 30 April 2009 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s partial decision on admissibility, which is available in HUDOC QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES   1.     Is Article 8 applicable in the present case? If so, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?   2.     Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his age, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8?