CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 mai 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s32D06BEA { width:210pt; display:inline-block } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s87F05BA2 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sEC177689 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:36pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s9296A950 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify }     FIFTH SECTION Application no. 58221/10 S.K. against Russia lodged on 8 October 2010     The original facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s initial Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties, which is available in HUDOC.   QUESTIONS     1.     With respect to the detention ordered by the Presnenskiy Court on 24   November 2009, did the applicant have at his disposal a procedure by which lawfulness of his detention could be examined and his release ordered, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention?   2.     With respect to the detention extended by the Presnenskiy Court on 11 January 2010, did the applicant have at his disposal a procedure by which lawfulness of his detention could be examined and his release ordered, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention?   3.     With respect to the detention extended by the Presnenskiy Court on 14 May 2010, did the applicant have at his disposal a procedure by which lawfulness of his detention could be examined and his release ordered, as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention?