CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 30 avril 2013

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3C4DB099 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:10pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s42BBCF49 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:10pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s6108529E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s32ABB12B { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s6065665A { border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s152196C9 { border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt } .s22155D7A { height:23.25pt } .s5B8637C { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sB673203C { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s8EC1446F { border-style:solid double solid solid; border-width:0.75pt 1.5pt 0.75pt 0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .sBD204368 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s67F06EFC { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; color:#000000 } .s4B8D41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s3652B0A7 { height:17.55pt } .s3D45D7A { height:20.65pt } .s4735D7A { height:20.55pt } .s535CCDA5 { border-left-style:double; border-left-width:1.5pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:4.65pt } .s29BE6C23 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s78B6B604 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s90F1A5F0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:double; border-right-width:1.5pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:4.65pt; padding-left:5.03pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)74 7 cases against Slovak Republic Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 April 2013 at the 1169th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final, and following the Court’s finding of violations of the Convention in these cases;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgments;   Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that the respondent State placed the just satisfaction awarded in the judgments at the applicants disposal, and informed them thereof;   Recalling that the general measures required to prevent similar violations to those found by the Court in these cases have already been adopted in leading cases (see the relevant final resolutions cited in the appended table);   Noting furthermore, as the government considers and given the particular circumstances of each case, that no individual measure is necessary apart from the payment of just satisfaction,   DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent State, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.   Application No. Case name Date of judgment Date of final judgment Reference Final Resolution 45426/06 Gal 31/11/10 31/02/11 CM/ResDH(2011)158 (Kucera) 20271/06 Stetiar and Sutek 31/11/10 31/02/11 41238/05 Karlin 28/06/11 28/09/11 15684/05 Osvathova 21/12/10 21/03/11   11301/03 Lovecek 21/12/10 21/03/11 CM/ResDH(2007)10 41877/05 Varnacin 18/01/11 18/01/11   (Krumpel) 25329/05 Rosselet-Christ 26/10/10 26/01/11 CM/ResDH(2011)34 (Pavletic)