CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 août 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s3349BF3A { margin-top:42pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sECB3FADA { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sF0819273 { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:center } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s6C3B0BAF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:28.35pt } FIFTH SECTION Application no. 10543/03 Yuriy Semenovich LEONOV against Ukraine lodged on 1 March 2003 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s initial Statement of Facts and Questions to the Parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Were the applicant’s rights under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention respected? In particular, did the oral statement of police officer L. concerning the applicant’s confession of murder on 24 August 2001 play a crucial role in securing the applicant’s conviction? Was the above statement, without any documentary support and denied by the applicant, admissible evidence under the domestic law?