CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 septembre 2013

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }       FIRST SECTION Application no. 44292/09 Aleksandr Vladimirovich GVINIASHVILI against Russia lodged on 17 July 2009     The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s decision, which is available in HUDOC.   QUESTIONs TO THE PARTIES   1. When did the administration of Novocherkassk remand prison IZ-61/3 receive the Court’s letter of 18 December 2009 addressed to the applicant and when did the administration forward the letter to correctional colony IK-1?   2. Have there been any instances of delay in handing the Court’s correspondence to the applicant by the prison authorities?   3. If so, what was the justification for the alleged delay in forwarding that letter to the correctional colony?