CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 5 décembre 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s2E1B62A9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sDDB50A14 { color:#ff0000 } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s35BA672B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3A3C6A50 { height:2.9pt } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7FF5B588 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:70pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-70pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s47BB67E2 { font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s20C48CB4 { width:21pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sA6033488 { list-style-position:inside } .s38F34D94 { width:22.66pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s1E0BC0B5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:18pt } .sEAC9682F { width:17.1pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sBA55320B { width:21.55pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s5B9812EB { width:22.1pt; display:inline-block } Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)256 206 cases against Turkey Execution of the of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (Gençel group) (See Appendix for the list of cases) (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 December 2013 at the 1186th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established concerning the right to a fair trial on account of the lack of independence and impartiality of state security courts, and stressing that the Court considered in these judgments that the most appropriate form of redress for this violation would be to ensure that the applicants are granted a retrial by an independent and impartial tribunal (see § 27 in the Gençel case);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Recalling in this respect that the Committee has closely followed the developments regarding the taking of the necessary legislative measures within the context of the Hulki Güneş group of cases (see, in particular the interim resolutions adopted, ResDH(2005)113 , CM/ResDH(2007)26 and CM/ResDH(2007)150 );   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2013)1082 );   Welcoming in particular the adoption of the legislative amendment by the Turkish Parliament on 11 April 2013 within the context of the “Fourth Reform Package” and noting that, as a consequence of this amendment, the applicants in the present group of cases may request, if they so wish, the reopening of proceedings in their cases;   Recalling that, as far as the other violations established in the present group of cases are concerned, the Committee closed the examination of issues related to excessive length of detention in police custody and absence of a domestic remedy (violations of Article 5 §§ 3 and 4) within the context of the Sakık and other case (see ResDH(2002)110 ) as well as issues related to the violation of right to freedom of expression on account of convictions under former article 8 of Anti-terrorism Law within the context of the Arslan case (see ResDH(2006)79 );   Noting further in this respect that the Committee is currently examining the issues related to excessive length of proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy within the context of Ormancı and Kaplan group of cases and the issues related to excessive length of detention on remand within the context of Demirel group of cases;   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and DECIDES to close the examination thereof. Appendix   Application Case Judgment of Final on 53431/99 GENÇEL 23/10/2003 24/03/2004 39678/98 ACAR LEŞKER 22/06/2004 22/09/2004 55954/00 AKAR AND BEÇET 20/09/2005 20/12/2005 52656/99 AKBABA 17/01/2006 17/04/2006 59759/00 AKÇAKALE 25/05/2004 25/08/2004 65897/01 AKGÜL 16/01/2007 16/04/2007 59645/00 AKINTI AND OTHERS 15/02/2007 15/05/2007 52665/99 AKKAŞ ÇAĞLAR 23/10/03 24/03/04 41956/98 AKSAÇ 15/07/2004 15/10/2004 59234/00 AL AND OTHERS 13/11/03 24/03/04 66354/01 ALTUN ABDULLAH 19/10/2006 19/01/2007 63183/00 ASLAN BEDRI AND REŞIT 22/12/2005 22/03/2006 58055/00 ASLAN AND ŞANCI 05/12/2006 05/03/2007 59237/00 ASLAN MEHMET SALIH 15/07/2005 15/10/2005 62018/00 ASLAN MEHMET ŞERIF 03/05/2007 03/08/2007 1595/03 ASLAN TAMER AND OTHERS 02/06/2009 02/09/2009 62597/00 AYDIN RASIM 31/01/2008 30/04/2008 40297/98 AYDIN ŞEHMUZ 22/12/2004 22/03/2005 54501/00 AYDIN VOLKAN 10/11/2004 10/02/2005 41967/02 AYDOĞAN AND OTHERS 02/12/2008 02/03/2009 54275/00 AYTAN 20/09/2005 20/12/2005 63878/00 BALÇIK 26/04/2005 26/07/2005 46777/99 BARAN 23/01/2006 09/07/2007 64277/01 BAŞBOĞA 13/06/2006 13/09/2006 27709/02+ BAŞTIMAR AND OTHERS 03/04/2007 03/07/2007 57562/00 BECERIKLI AND ALTEKIN 08/01/2004 14/06/2004 65715/01 BENLI 20/02/2007 20/05/2007 60132/00 BORAK 05/12/2006 05/03/2007 46388/99 BOZKURT BILAL AND OTHERS 04/12/03 24/03/04 57345/00 BUDAK AND OTHERS 10/01/2006 10/04/2006 50282/99 BULUT ADEM AND OTHERS 02/03/2006 02/06/2006 49892/99 BULUT 22/11/2005 22/02/2006 55812/00 ÇALOĞLU VAHIT AND HILAN 29/07/2004 29/10/2004 38389/97 CAN MAHMUT 27/11/03 27/02/03 40395/98 CANEVI AND OTHERS 10/11/2004 10/02/2005 63354/00 CANPOLAT 15/02/2007 15/05/2007 70317/01 CANSEVEN 15/02/2007 15/05/2007 57019/00 ÇAPLIK HATIP 15/07/2005 15/10/2005 41580/98+ ÇAVUŞ AND BULUT 23/10/2003 24/03/2004 47757/99 ÇAVUŞOĞLU AND OTHERS 04/12/03 04/03/04 56835/00 ÇELIK AND OTHERS 20/04/2006 20/07/2006 61650/00 ÇELIK MEHMET 15/07/2005 15/10/2005 47115/99 ÇELIK ULAŞ 24/07/2007 24/10/2007 75573/01 ÇELIKER 02/10/2007 02/01/2008 57944/00 ÇETINKAYA AND OTHERS 18/12/2003 14/06/2004 59640/00 ÇIFTÇI EVRIM 29/11/2005 01/03/2006 48155/99 ÇINAR 15/01/2004 14/06/2004 52898/99 ÇOLAK No. 1 15/07/2004 15/10/2004 53530/99 ÇOLAK No. 2 15/07/2004 15/10/2004 225/02 ÇOMAK 10/10/2006 10/01/2007 51416/99 DALGIÇ 23/10/03 24/03/04 60262/00 DEMIR EBRU 22/11/2005 22/02/2006 55373/00 DEMIR FIKRI 11/04/2006 11/07/2006 42437/98 DINÇ RIZA 28/10/2004 02/02/2005 50193/99 DOĞAN AND KESER 24/06/2004 24/09/2004 49503/99 DOĞAN HALIL 29/01/2004 14/06/2004 62017/00 DOĞRU 10/11/2005 10/02/2006 29592/96 DOLAŞAN 18/01/2005 18/04/2005 34498/97 DÖNER 26/10/2004 26/01/2005 47654/99 DURAN OSMAN 04/12/03 04/03/04 40997/98 DURAN TAHIR 29/01/2004 14/06/2004 46506/99+ DURMAZ AND OTHERS 14/10/2004 14/01/2005 55913/00 DURMAZ HIDIR 05/12/2006 05/03/2007 44267/98 DURSUN AND OTHERS 04/12/03 04/03/04 43926/98 EPÖZDEMIR 28/10/2004 28/01/2005 52782/99 ERÇIKDI AND OTHERS 11/04/2006 11/07/2006 53895/00 ERDOĞAN MESUT 23/10/03 24/03/04 46106/99 EREN 23/10/03 24/03/04 52744/99 ERGÜL AND ENGIN 23/10/03 24/03/04 59769/00 EROĞLU 21/09/2006 21/12/2006 56021/00 EROLAN AND OTHERS 15/01/2004 14/06/2004 54814/00 EŞIDIR AND OTHERS 11/10/2005 11/01/2006 21865/02 EVCIMEN 29/11/2007 02/06/2008 64447/01 GARBUL 19/07/2007 19/10/2007 67634/01 GERÇEK 31/01/2008 07/07/2008 8126/02 GIÇ 21/07/2009 21/10/2009 71813/01 GÖCEKLI 21/12/2006 21/03/2007 49655/99 GÖKDERE AND GÜL 09/12/2004 09/03/2005 52746/99 GÜLER AND ÇALIŞKAN 21/12/2006 21/03/2007 60853/00 GÜLLÜ İBRAHIM 14/06/2007 14/09/2007 1889/04 GÜLLÜ 10/11/2005 15/02/2006 67483/01 GÜNDOĞAN No. 2 16/01/2007 16/04/2007 49240/99 GÜNDOĞDU 03/05/2007 03/08/2007 59997/00 GÜNDÜZ MÜSLÜM No. 2 12/07/2005 12/10/2005 47296/99 GÜNEL 27/11/03 27/02/03 53968/00 GÜNEŞ İSMAIL 13/11/03 13/02/04 46272/99 GÜNEŞ 22/04/2004 10/11/2004 1827/02+ GÜRSOY AND OTHERS 31/10/2006 31/01/2007 40528/98 GÜVEN AHMET AND OTHERS 22/01/2004 14/06/2004 37625/03 GÜVEN BIRTAN AND OTHERS 31/07/2007 31/10/2007 54479/00 GÜZEL No. 1 04/04/2006 04/07/2006 57343/00 HATUN AND OTHERS 20/10/2005 20/01/2006 54919/00 İÇÖZ 15/01/2004 14/06/2004 75603/01 İLDAN 26/06/2007 26/09/2007 58057/00 İREY 27/07/2004 27/10/2004 47340/99 JALALIAGHDAM 22/01/2004 14/06/2004 57939/00 KALYONCUGIL AND OTHERS 29/01/2004 14/06/2004 52691/99 KARABAŞ 21/07/2005 21/10/2005 56015/00 KARABULUT 24/01/2008 07/07/2008 64293/01 KARADUMANLI 30/09/2008 30/12/2008 45718/99 KARAKURT 20/09/2005 15/02/2006 60161/00 KARAOĞLAN 31/10/2006 31/01/2007 65942/01 KARATEPE MUSTAFA 29/11/2007 29/02/2008 41551/98 KARATEPE 31/07/2007 31/10/2007 59641/00 KARTAL AND KIZILDAĞ 08/04/2008 08/07/2008 69790/01 KAVAK 09/11/2006 09/02/2007 54335/00 KAYA AND OTHERS 24/06/2004 24/09/2004 2624/02 KAYA HIDIR 09/01/2007 09/04/2007 44054/98 KAYA İRFAN 22/01/2004 14/06/2004 57758/00 KAYMAZ AND OTHERS 28/10/2004 28/01/2005 52701/99+ KEÇECI 15/07/2005 15/10/2005 60574/00 KEKLIK 06/07/2006 06/10/2006 67215/01 KENAR 13/12/2007 13/03/2008 35363/02 KEPENEKLIOĞLU AND CANPOLAT 06/09/2005 06/12/2005 58058/00 KEZER AND OTHERS 24/01/2006 24/04/2006 40498/98 KILIÇ MURAT 30/09/2004 30/12/2004 48083/99 KILINÇ MÜKREMIN 15/03/2005 15/06/2005 44785/98 KIPER 23/05/2006 23/08/2006 76400/01 KIRANCI 26/06/2007 26/09/2007 48062/99 KIRCAN MUSTAFA 22/01/2004 14/06/2004 48263/99 KIRMAN 27/11/03 27/02/03 71354/01 KOÇ FEHMI 27/03/2007 27/06/2007 40991/98 KOÇAK KEMAL 19/07/2007 19/10/2007 49523/99 KONUK 22/06/2006 22/09/2006 50903/99 KORKMAZ 22/01/2004 14/06/2004 61648/00 KUTAL AND UĞRAŞ 13/06/2006 13/09/2006 42434/98 MUT 11/04/2006 11/07/2006 43818/98 N.K. 30/01/03 30/04/03 65887/01 OKUYUCU AND BILMEN 16/01/2007 16/04/2007 63357/00 ÖNCÜ AND OTHERS 29/11/2005 01/03/2006 64684/01 ÖNER AND OTHERS 25/10/2005 25/01/2006 44662/98 ÖZ AND YÜREKLI 19/07/2007 19/10/2007 50087/99 ÖZBEY MÜSLÜM 21/12/2006 21/03/2007 56006/00 ÖZCAN MEHMET AND OTHERS 11/10/2005 11/01/2006 55427/00 ÖZCAN SERDAR 08/04/2004 08/07/2004 46952/99 ÖZDEMIR HIDIR 15/01/2004 14/06/2004 42141/98 ÖZDEN 24/05/2005 24/08/2005 49707/99 ÖZDOĞAN 18/01/2005 18/04/2005 48059/99 ÖZER K. AND OTHERS 22/04/2004 22/07/2004 48438/99 ÖZERTIKOĞLU İSMAIL 22/01/2004 14/06/2004 58397/00 ÖZSOY 02/02/2006 02/05/2006 59244/00 ÖZTÜRK AYŞE 04/11/2004 04/02/2005 52695/99 ÖZTÜRK 20/09/2005 20/12/2005 51289/99 ÖZÜLKÜ 27/11/03 27/02/03 60177/00 ÖZÜPEK AND OTHERS 15/03/2005 15/06/2005 48617/99 ÖZYOL 23/10/03 24/03/04 49276/99 PEKER MEHMET 20/11/2007 31/03/2008 53014/99 PEKER 23/10/03 24/03/04 32489/03 POLAT HASAN 22/09/2009 22/12/2009 48065/99 POLAT METIN AND OTHERS 15/01/2004 14/06/2004 38422/97 REYHAN 21/07/2005 21/10/2005 54545/00 ŞAHINDOĞAN 30/11/2004 28/02/2005 57919/00 ŞAHMO 20/09/2005 20/12/2005 48054/99 SARIOĞLU 04/12/03 24/03/04 56016/00 SEÇKIN AND OTHERS 03/05/2007 03/08/2007 41968/98 SEKIN DURAN 02/02/2006 02/05/2006 63306/00 SEZER ZEKERIYA 29/11/2007 29/02/2008 50118/99 ŞIMŞEK 23/10/2003 24/03/2004 47328/99 ŞIRIN 15/03/2005 15/06/2005 50119/99 SÜVARIOĞULLARI AND OTHERS 23/10/03 24/03/04 13797/02 ŞUYUR 23/05/2006 23/08/2006 30452/96 TAKAK 01/04/2004 07/07/2004 45907/99 TANRIKOLU AND OTHERS 20/10/2005 12/04/2006 60011/00 TANRIKULU AND DENIZ 18/04/2006 18/07/2006 62877/00 TAŞ DEDE 10/11/2005 10/02/2006 48134/99 TAŞ YEŞIM 04/12/03 04/03/04 49517/99 TAŞKIN HÜSEYIN 04/12/03 04/03/04 48805/99 TAYDAŞ AND ÖZER 04/11/2004 04/02/2005 69515/01 TEKIN AND TAŞTAN 11/01/2005 11/04/2005 64570/01 TEKIN HALIS 19/07/2007 19/10/2007 52899/99 TEKIN MAHSUN 20/12/2005 20/03/2006 41990/98 TEMIRKAN 20/09/2005 20/12/2005 35070/97 TEZCAN UZUNHASANOĞLU 20/04/2004 20/07/2004 48060/99 TOKAY AND ULUS 23/03/2006 23/06/2006 57561/00 TOPRAK 08/01/04 08/04/04 48095/99 TÖRE NAZIF 14/04/2005 14/07/2005 42738/98 TUNCEL AND OTHERS 27/11/03 24/03/04 51053/99 TUTMAZ AND OTHERS 23/10/03 24/03/04 55951/00 UÇAR AND OTHERS 27/11/03 27/02/03 42775/98 ÜKÜNÇ AND GÜNEŞ 18/12/2003 14/06/2004 48616/99 ÜNAL SÜLEYMAN 10/11/2004 10/02/2005 48544/99 UZUN 20/04/2006 20/07/2006 46284/99 YANIKOĞLU 14/10/2004 14/01/2005 52661/99 YAVUZ KENAN 13/11/03 13/02/04 53586/99 YAVUZASLAN 22/04/2004 22/07/2004 57965/00 YAYAN İBRAHIM 20/04/2006 20/07/2006 50249/99 YEŞIL 01/07/2004 01/10/2004 52162/99 YEŞILTAŞ HÜSEYIN AND KAYA ZEKI 15/07/2005 15/10/2005 40518/98 YILDIRIM SÜLEYMAN 29/07/2004 29/10/2004 52164/99 YILDIZ AND OTHERS 21/07/2005 21/10/2005 26892/02 YILDIZ AND SEVINÇ 27/10/2009 27/01/2010 49156/99 YILDIZ BEKIR 06/09/2005 15/02/2006 58400/00 YILDIZ HÜSEYIN 25/10/2005 25/01/2006 47874/99 YILMAZ AND BARIM 22/06/2006 22/09/2006 57172/00 YILMAZ AND DURÇ 22/12/2005 22/03/2006 62319/00 YILMAZ FEYYAZ 15/07/2005 15/10/2005 50743/99 YILMAZ HAYRETTIN BARBAROS 23/10/2003 24/03/2004 53497/99 YILMAZ LEVENT CAN 21/07/2005 21/10/2005 47278/99 YILMAZ MAHMUT AND OTHERS 08/08/2006 08/11/2006 42552/98 YILMAZ MEHMET BÜLENT AND YILMAZ ŞAHIN 07/10/2004 07/01/2005 45733/99 YILMAZ METIN 22/12/2004 22/03/2005 48992/99 YILMAZ MURAT 24/06/2004 24/09/2004 66689/01 YILMAZ YILDIZ 11/10/2005 11/01/2006 62227/00 YÜKSEKTEPE 24/10/2006 26/03/2007 47628/99 YURTSEVER 02/02/2006 02/05/2006 60848/00 ZENGIN BÜLENT 29/11/2007 29/02/2008   EXECUTION OF THE GENCEL GROUP OF CASES   ACTION REPORT                 FACTS                   The cases in the Gencel Group concern violation of the applicants’ right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial court on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the state security courts which tried and convicted them. They relied on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial court) of the Convention. The precedent judgment in the case of Gencel v. Turkey became final on 24 March 2004 and currently 206 judgments are being supervised by Committee of Ministers under this group.                 JUDGMENTS                   The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article   6 §   1.                 INDIVIDUAL MEASURES   Just satisfaction                   The just satisfaction amounts awarded by the Court have been paid to the applicants in due time and relevant documents indicating payment have been submitted to the Department for the Execution of the Court Judgments.   Other Individual Measures                   The Court considered that where an individual was convicted by a domestic court which did not meet the Convention requirements of independence and impartiality, a retrial or a reopening of the case, if so requested, represented in principle an appropriate way of redress for the violation.                   The reopening of judicial proceedings has been an existing legal remedy in the Turkish legal system. However, the applicants’ proceedings in the Gencel Group of cases could be reopened due to an exceptional time restriction provided under Article 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.                   A provisional article has been added to the Code of Criminal Procedure by “The Law Amending Certain Laws in the Context of Human Rights and Freedom of Expression” (hereinafter “the Law”), which is known in Turkey as the “Fourth Judicial Reform Package”. It was adopted by the Turkish Parliament on 11   April 2013 and came into force on 30 April 2013.                   The above-mentioned provisional article has made it possible for the applicants to request the reopening of proceedings in all relevant cases that have been under the supervision of the Committee of Ministers as of 15 June 2012. Accordingly, retrial requests could be made within three months following the entry into force of the Law. Therefore it has been possible for all applicants in the Gencel Group of cases to request the reopening of proceedings.                   The Law was published on the Official Gazette in 30 April 2013. It received broad media coverage during its legislative process and thereafter. Consequently, the content of the Law is well known by the public and should be known by the applicants in these cases as well.                 GENERAL MEASURES   Translation and Publication of the Judgment                   The judgments in the Gencel Group of cases have been translated into Turkish and published on the official website of the Human Rights Department of the Ministry of Justice.   These judgments are available at http://www.inhak.adalet.gov.tr/ .               The translated judgments have been disseminated to the relevant institutions such as the Ministry of Interior, the Court of Cassation, the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors and the Justice Academy, as well as to the domestic courts that have rendered the judgments.                  EXECUTION               The Gencel Group of cases present similarities to the judgment in the case of Çıraklar v. Turkey (28 October 1998) which was closed by a final resolution, DH(99)555, following the legislative and constitutional amendments changing the composition of state security courts and ending the functions of military judges and military prosecutors in these courts. The Parliament subsequently approved a constitutional amendment on 7 May 2004, abolishing state security courts.   Consequently the Government considers that there is no further general measure which needs to be taken for the execution of the Gencel group of cases.               Additionally, the Court has unanimously declared the case of Hulki Güneş v. Turkey (17210/09) inadmissible on 2 July 2013. The Court observed that “a new law enacted by Turkey on 11 April 2013 allowed the reopening of those cases against Turkey in which the European Court of Human Rights had found a violation of the Convention and in respect of which execution proceedings had been pending before the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 15 June 2012”. Under the Law, the applicant had the possibility to request the reopening of the proceedings within three months of its entry into force, that is, from 30 April 2013. The Court therefore considered that the complaint was manifestly ill-founded and declared it inadmissible.   13.   In the light of the submissions made above, the Government maintains that Turkey has taken the necessary individual and general measures for the execution of the judgments in the Gencel Group cases and kindly invites the Committee of Ministers to close their examination.