CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE — 5 décembre 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sA54E3CC5 { font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s23ADBB69 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s35D14A4C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:56.7pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)258 K.A. et autres contre Royaume-Uni Exécution de la décision de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme   Requête n o Affaire Date de la décision 63008/11 K.A. ET AUTRES 22/01/2013   (adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 5 décembre 2013, lors de la 1186e réunion des Délégués des Ministres)     Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 39, paragraphe 4, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des termes des règlements amiables tels qu’ils figurent dans les décisions de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci ‑ après «   la Convention   » et «   la Cour   »)   ;   Considérant que dans cette affaire la Cour, ayant pris acte d’un règlement amiable auquel avaient abouti le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur et la partie requérante, et s’étant assurée que le règlement était basé sur le respect des droits de l’homme tel que défini dans la Convention ou ses Protocoles, a décidé de rayer cette affaire du rôle   ;   S’étant assuré de l’exécution des termes du règlement amiable par le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur, (voir document DH-DD(2013)1095 [1] ),   DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 39, paragraphe 4, de la Convention et   DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.     Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Action Report   KA and others v UK (application No. 63008/11; decision final on 22/01/2013)   Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 8 October 2013 (anglais uniquement)     Case Summary   The case concerned the proposed expulsion of the applicants, a mother and her three minor children, from the United Kingdom to Pakistan. The applicants complained that their proposed expulsion would be a violation of Articles 2, 3, 8 and 13 of the Convention. On 22 January 2013, the case was struck out of the Court’s list of cases on the basis of a friendly settlement reached between the parties as follows:   “the United Kingdom Border Agency would grant the applicants leave to remain in the United Kingdom outside the immigration rules for a period of thirty months in full and final settlement of their complaints before the Court and confirmed that the applicants may be entitled to a further period of leave at the end of that period if, at that time, they had a protection need or if they met the requirements of the immigration rules in respect of private or family life.”     Individual Measures   The applicants were all granted discretionary leave to remain in the UK on 13 May 2013. Their leave expires on 12 November 2015, upon which they may seek an extension of their stay in the United Kingdom.     General Measures   In light of the individual circumstances of the Court’s decision, the case does not require the adoption of any general measures.     State of execution of decision:   The government considers that it has taken all necessary measures required to execute the terms of the friendly settlement as set out in the Court’s decision.     [1] Anglais uniquement.