CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 3 juillet 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sA64C57B1 { font-style:italic; text-decoration:underline } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } 1175th meeting – 3 July 2013   Appendix 9 (Item H46-1)   Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)136 Thirty eight cases against «   the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 July 2013 at the 1175th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Case, Application number Date of the decision ANASTASOV, Application No. 15269/05 18/09/2012 ANGELESKA, Application No. 42685/05 18/09/2012 MANCEV, Application No. 42806/05 27/11/2012 STOIMCEV and SALEV, Application No. 45081/05 18/09/2012 SPASOVSKI, Application No. 31448/06 27/11/2012 KOSTADINOVSKI, Application No. 10283/07 18/09/2012 TODOROVA, Application No. 11196/07 18/09/2012 JANEV, Application No. 29391/07 18/09/2012 SERAFIMOVSKI, Application No. 50916/07 27/11/2012 MICEVSKA TOTOCEVSKA, Application No. 2091/08 18/09/2012 GORGIOSKI, Application No. 3521/08 18/09/2012 MARKOVSKA TASEVSKA, Application No. 6238/08 18/09/2012 EFREMOV, Application No. 16958/08 18/09/2012 BINISOSKI, Application No. 24164/08 18/09/2012 KOCEVA, Application No. 29194/08 18/09/2012 SPASEVSKA, Application No. 42352/08 18/09/2012 TRAJKOV, Application No. 54702/08 18/09/2012 PACIRKOV, Application No. 54722/08 18/09/2012 NIKOLOVSKI, Application No. 58924/08 18/09/2012 ZERDESKA, Application No. 1758/09 18/09/2012 DESKOSKI, Application No. 1764/09 18/09/2012 BAJRAMI, Application No. 1829/09 18/09/2012 KECIK, Application No. 2147/09 18/09/2012 TANESKI, Application No. 2287/09 18/09/2012 ONCEVSKA, Application No. 4974/09 18/09/2012 MITKOVSKI, Application No. 5505/09 18/09/2012 AMZOVSKI, Application No. 14158/09 18/09/2012 VASILEV, Application No. 20384/09 18/09/2012 NIKOLOVSKA, Application No. 21432/09 18/09/2012 DOO 'PIV KOMERC' BITOLA, Application No. 26048/09 18/09/2012 JANEVSKI AND OTHERS, Application No. 33810/09 18/09/2012 ARSOV, Application No. 42877/09 18/09/2012 BUZEVSKI, Application No. 59602/09 18/09/2012 ZMEJKOSKA, Application No. 61838/09 18/09/2012 LOVECKO DRUSTVO 'OSOGOVO', Application No. 62667/09 18/09/2012 STOJANOVIK AND OTHERS, Application No. 66055/09 18/09/2012 BRAJEVIK, Application No. 58408/10 18/09/2012 STOJCEVIK, Application No. 64371/10 18/09/2012   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously, to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.