CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE — 20 novembre 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sA54E3CC5 { font-size:6pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Résolution CM/ResDH(2013)236 Ncube contre Royaume-Uni Exécution de la décision de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme   Requête n o Affaire Date de la décision 4428/12 NCUBE 04/12/2013   (adoptée par le Comité des Ministres le 20 novembre 2013 lors de la 1185e (Budget) réunion des Délégués des Ministres)     Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article 39, paragraphe 4, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des termes des règlements amiables tels qu’ils figurent dans les décisions de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (ci ‑ après «   la Convention   » et «   la Cour   »),   Considérant que dans cette affaire la Cour, ayant pris acte d’un règlement amiable auquel avaient abouti le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur et la partie requérante, et s’étant assurée que le règlement était basé sur le respect des droits de l’homme tel que défini dans la Convention ou ses Protocoles, a décidé de rayer cette affaire du rôle   ;   S’étant assuré de l’exécution des termes du règlement amiable par le gouvernement de l’Etat défendeur, (voir document DH-DD(2013)1015 ),   DECLARE qu’il a rempli ses fonctions en vertu de l’article 39, paragraphe 4, de la Convention et   DECIDE d’en clore l’examen.     Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Action report (Anglais uniquement)     Ncube v UK (Application No. 4428/12; decision final on 4/12/2012)   Information submitted by the United Kingdom Government on 19 September 2013   Case summary   The case concerned the applicant’s proposed expulsion from the United Kingdom to Zimbabwe. The applicant complained that his proposed expulsion would be a disproportionate interference with his right to private life under Article 8 of the Convention. On 4 December 2012, the case was struck out of the Court’s list of cases on the basis of a friendly settlement reached between the parties as follows:   “the United Kingdom Border Agency will grant Mr Ncube leave outside the rules to remain in the United Kingdom for a period of thirty months and the payment of £500 in full and final settlement of the applicant’s claim against the government before the Court”.   Individual measures   The sum of £500 agreed in the friendly settlement, has already been paid to the applicant and evidence previously supplied.   The applicant has been granted leave to remain in the United Kingdom under the Article 8 rules until 7   August 2015, at which time the applicant may seek an extension of his stay in the United Kingdom.   General measures   In light of the individual circumstances of the Court’s decision, the case does not require the adoption of any general measures.   State of execution of decision:   The government considers that it has taken all necessary measures required to execute the terms of the friendly settlement as set out in the Court’s decision.