CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 19 juin 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD81AB0A7 { height:11.35pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4CDBBA1E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s70B41AB9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s790D6B17 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s309031D4 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s63D113AA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.45pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)124 110 cases against Poland Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 June 2013 at the 1174th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Case, Application No. Date of decision BEREZOWSKI, Application No. 6585/02 08/02/2011 DOMISZEWSK, Application No. 34387/02 08/02/2011 BIERNACKI, Application No. 37853/03 25/01/2011 NOWACKI, Application No. 16116/04 08/02/2011 SUCHODOLSKI, Application No. 26133/04 25/01/2011 WOLSKA, Application No. 36707/04 20/03/2012 BRUCZYNSKI (No. 2), Application No. 41041/06 08/02/2011 MAREK, Application No. 3032/07 29/05/2012 SAMBORSKI, Application No. 5065/07 28/06/2011 KAZMIERCZAK, Application No. 12905/07 13/12/2011 KOZIELEC, Application No. 13199/07 13/03/2012 MATUSZKIEWICZ, Application No. 15094/07 15/11/2011 A.L. (No. 3), Application No. 18476/07 31/01/2012 BACZA, Application No. 18812/07 25/01/2011 DAWIDOWSKI, Application No. 25424/07 11/09/2012 ZUKOW, Application No. 40612/07 13/12/2011 GOLDYN, Application No. 43888/07 15/11/2011 DATON, Application No. 44499/07 06/03/2012 ADAMSKA, Application No. 5031/08 20/03/2012 KESKA, Application No. 5584/08 11/04/2012 SKORSKI, Application No. 11301/08 15/11/2011 LYS, Application No. 41174/08 05/07/2012 SOBOLEWSKI (VI), Application No. 45111/08 22/11/2011 MAREK, Application No. 48092/08 03/07/2012 KASPRZAK (IV), Application No. 51054/08 20/03/2012 BARAN, Application No. 51661/08 06/03/2012 DRADRACH, Application No. 3983/09 24/01/2012 JAMROZEK, Application No. 7346/09 11/09/2012 MALKOWSKI, Application No. 11126/09 06/03/2012 PACZOSKA, Application No. 14051/09 29/11/2011 BLASZCZAK, Application No. 15323/09 06/12/2011 BOGUCKI, Application No. 16188/09 30/08/2011 DOBRZYNSKI, Application No. 16366/09 15/11/2011 PRUSZYNSKI, Application No. 23943/09 11/04/2012 KRUCZEK, Application No. 26855/09 14/02/2012 GLINKOWSKA, Application No. 30214/09 25/09/2012 JURGA, Application No. 30540/09 22/06/2010 FEDYCZKOWSKI, Application No. 36301/09 25/01/2011 MALKOWSKI, Application No. 36944/09 13/12/2011 WINIARSKA, Application No. 38726/09 10/01/2012 JAROSZ, Application No. 39508/09 09/10/2012 WASYLUK, Application No. 40844/09 11/09/2012 PIETKIEWICZ, Application No. 44938/09 24/01/2012 BOGURSKI, Application No. 47636/09 13/12/2011 KISIEL (II), Application No. 51136/09 31/01/2012 HOLOMEK, Application No. 53500/09 11/04/2012 DUDZIAK, Application No. 55168/09 05/07/2011 CEMBALA (II), Application No. 56836/09 07/02/2012 WROBLEWSKI (VII), Application No. 56874/09 09/10/2012 DAWIDOWICZ, Application No. 64739/09 16/10/2012 KUJAWA (II), Application No. 2206/10 21/02/2012 SZYMANOWSKI (II), Application No. 3683/10 14/02/2012 WROBLEWSKI (VIII), Application No. 7192/10 24/01/2012 KOLINSKI, Application No. 8148/10 06/09/2011 BACZA, Application No. 12064/10 25/09/2012 BULATOWICZ, Application No. 17719/10 20/03/2012 WYSZYNSKI, Application No. 18461/10 14/02/2012 BAJAKUSZEW, Application No. 23188/10 25/01/2011 KIT, Application No. 25968/10 27/03/2012 PRZYBYLSKI (II), Application No. 27179/10 18/10/2011 DZIEKANSKI, Application No. 34454/10 20/03/2012 ROK (II), Application No. 35666/10 25/01/2011 BANASZKOWSKI (III), Application No. 35938/10 07/02/2012 JANUSZEWSKI, Application No. 36347/10 15/11/2011 NAREWSKI (II), Application No. 36960/10 20/03/2012 STOLARSKI, Application No. 37730/10 07/02/2012 SANKIEWICZ, Application No. 38423/10 27/03/2012 SLESIK, Application No. 38794/10 14/06/2012 RADKIEWICZ, Application No. 40548/10 13/11/2012 RADKIEWICZ, Application No. 41626/10 13/11/2012 KUBARA, Application No. 44361/10 09/10/2012 BOGUSLAWSKI VEL DOBROSLAWSKI, Application No. 48986/10 11/04/2012 ZURAWSKI, Application No. 49165/10 22/11/2011 KALBARCZYK (II), Application No. 49780/10 11/09/2012 JASTRZEBSKI, Application No. 51881/10 27/03/2012 OWCZARCZYK, Application No. 55595/10 06/03/2012 KALKA, Application No. 57704/10 29/05/2012 CZEKAJ, Application No. 58141/10 06/03/2012 CZAPLINSKI, Application No. 58143/10 11/04/2012 TERLECKI, Application No. 60618/10 25/09/2012 GALUS, Application No. 61673/10 15/11/2011 WIELGUS, Application No. 62120/10 27/03/2012 RYL (II), Application No. 62681/10 11/04/2012 AKSMAN, Application No. 63589/10 11/04/2012 FLIS (III), Application No. 68091/10 14/02/2012 KASZTAN, Application No. 72269/10 24/01/2012 BALAKLEJEWSKI, Application No. 73452/10 27/03/2012 PAWILOWSKI, Application No. 185/11 24/01/2012 SOBUSIAK, Application No. 1937/11 06/12/2011 SOMLA, Application No. 2143/11 24/01/2012 GOLONKO, Application No. 3463/11 13/11/2012 NOCHOWICZ (II), Application No. 6859/11 25/09/2012 POKRZYWKA, Application No. 7066/11 09/10/2012 ZYGMUNT, Application No. 10305/11 14/06/2012 MURAWSKI, Application No. 16997/11 16/10/2012 ZNAJEWSKI, Application No. 18244/11 11/09/2012 CIESIELSKI, Application No. 18344/11 07/02/2012 KEDZIERSKI, Application No. 19272/11 04/09/2012 ULATOWSKI, Application No. 29848/11 06/03/2012 NOWAK, Application No. 31835/11 29/05/2012 SCHLABS, Application No. 32931/11 20/03/2012 GAWEL (II), Application No. 33635/11 29/11/2011 BULHAK, Application No. 44770/11 04/09/2012 BUCZEK, Application No. 44796/11 11/09/2012 GONSLAWSKI (II), Application No. 46719/11 11/04/2012 JAROSZYNSKI, Application No. 61002/11 04/09/2012 LARYSZ, Application No. 63266/11 25/09/2012 JURGIELEWICZ (II), Application No. 70795/11 09/10/2012 JUREWICZ (XI), Application No. 71482/11 11/09/2012 BIERNAT (II), Application No. 72591/11 04/09/2012     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.