CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 11 septembre 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s88A4DB4E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s6A269875 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s11BEB50D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s241BF43A { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)164 Twenty-four cases against Poland Execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   Case, Application No. Date of decision GALECKA, Application No. 10253/08 18/12/2012 STASZEWSKI, Application No. 20139/08 13/09/2011 SWIATOPELK-ZAWADZKI, Application No. 31176/08 20/11/2012 GOLA, Application No. 52446/08 13/11/2012 LUZAROWSKI, Application No. 19174/09 11/12/2012 KISIL, Application No. 44002/09 11/12/2012 GERTER, Application No. 47643/09 29/01/2013 SZALATY, Application No. 55239/09 29/01/2013 KOZLOWSKA, Application No. 62556/09 27/11/2012 MARMUZIEWICZ (II), Application No. 24759/10 11/12/2012 NEDZEWICZ (II), Application No. 43610/10 18/12/2012 KULAWIAK, Application No. 45170/10 12/02/2013 CHRABALOWSKA, Application No. 49252/10 27/11/2012 WROCZYNSKI, Application No. 59443/10 15/01/2013 SAWICKI, Application No. 6609/11 18/12/2012 JABLONSKI (XVII), Application No. 42421/11 11/12/2012 LESNIAK (III), Application No. 59812/11 18/12/2012 DABROWSKI, Application No. 64016/11 22/01/2013 SWIERCZ, Application No. 72189/11 11/12/2012 WOLOSOWICZ, Application No. 73358/11 29/01/2013 CIESIELSKI, Application No. 76536/11 11/12/2012 WASSERMANN, Application No. 76931/11 18/12/2012 BUDZISZEWSKI, Application No. 16544/12 29/01/2013 SOSZYNSKI, Application No. 23854/12 15/01/2013   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 September 2013 at the 1177th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.