CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 11 septembre 2013

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)169 Twenty-seven cases against Serbia Execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights   Case, Application No. Date of decision VASOV, Application No. 6156/07 13/11/2012 KOSANIN, Application No. 12192/07 29/11/2011 MILOSAVLJEVIC 28, Application No. 21478/07 11/12/2012 BINJOS, Application No. 25335/07 10/01/2012 NOVAKOVIC, Application No. 32145/07 27/09/2011 VELJOVIC, Application No. 32777/07 14/09/2010 DOKIC, Application No. 33086/07 20/03/2012 HAMIDOVIC (II), Application No. 39849/07 27/09/2011 JEVTIC, Application No. 50313/07 27/09/2011 STEFANOVIC, Application No. 704/08 11/12/2012 PETKOVIC, Application No. 12909/08 13/11/2012 UGRINOVIC, Application No. 13617/08 13/11/2012 KOJIC and JOVANOVIC, Application No. 14400/08 13/11/2012 DORDEVIC and NIKOLIC, Application No. 14414/08 27/09/2011 TODOROVIC, Application No. 14536/08 13/11/2012 PERISIC, Application No. 15105/08 13/11/2012 NIKOLIC, Application No. 15122/08 13/11/2012 LAZIC, Application No. 26884/08 13/11/2012 JEREMIC, Application No. 31178/08 20/03/2012 JOVANOVIC, Application No. 37159/08 13/11/2012 RADULOVIC SOFRONIC, Application No. 39346/08 15/01/2013 BAUMGARTNER AND 3 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 39470/08 13/11/2012 ANDRIC AND 49 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 45597/08 10/01/2012 TOMIC AND 20 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 45616/08 14/02/2012 MILUNOVIC, Application No. 3716/09 21/02/2012 RADIVOJEVIC AND 13 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 32635/10 10/05/2012 JOVANOVIC, Application No. 19572/11 13/11/2012   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 September 2013 at the 1177th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.