CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 5 février 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sA0611542 { color:#000000 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)11 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in thirty one cases against Portugal   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 30533/03 CARVALHO ACABADO 18/10/2005 15/02/2006 21240/02+ COMPANHIA AGRÍCOLA DE PENHA GARCIA, S.A. AND 16 OTHER CASES “AGRARIAN REFORM” 19/12/2006 19/03/2007 41453/02 HERDADE DA COMPORTA - ACTIVIDADES AGRO SILVÍCOLA E TURÍSTICAS, S.A. 10/07/2007 31/03/2008 31677/04 SOCIEDADE AGRÍCOLA HERDADE DA PALMA S.A. 10/07/2007 12/11/2007 10172/04 CAMPOS COSTA AND OTHERS 30/10/2007 30/01/2008 21513/05 COMPANHIA AGRÍCOLA DA BARROSINHA S.A. 15/01/2008 15/04/2008 44311/04+ COSTA CAPUCHO AND 23 OTHER CASES “AGRARIAN REFORM” 15/01/2008 15/04/2008 17199/05+ SOCIEDADE AGRÍCOLA DA HERDADE DAS VÁRZEAS, LDA AND 22 OTHER CASES “AGRARIAN REFORM” 23/09/2008 23/12/2008 24668/05 COMPANHIA AGRÍCOLA CORTES E VALBOM S.A. 30/09/2008 30/12/2008 25025/05 DE SOUSA CARVALHO SEABRA 16/12/2008 16/03/2009 30844/05 DE AVELLAR CORDEIRO ZAGALLO 13/01/2009 08/06/2010 13/04/2009 04/10/2010 31720/05 KINDLER DE BARAHONA 10/02/2009 10/05/2009 44386/05 MELO E FARO MALDONADO PASSANHA AND OTHERS 24/02/2009 24/05/2009 35254/05 SIMÕES ALVES NORONHA 03/03/2009 03/06/2009 30808/05 VASCONCELOS DO COUTO AND 23 OTHER CASES “AGRARIAN REFORM” 03/03/2009 03/06/2009 11019/06 COMPANHIA AGRÍCOLA DO VALE DE ÁGUA, S.A. 15/12/2009 15/03/2010 41954/05+ SAMPAIO DE LEMOS AND 22 OTHER “AGRARIAN REFORM” CASES 15/12/2009 28/06/2010 1408/06 VILHENA PERES SANTOS LANCA THEMUDO E MELO AND OTHERS 15/12/2009 15/03/2010 12883/06 COMPANHIA AGRÍCOLA DAS POLVOROSAS S.A. 16/03/2010 16/06/2010 29378/06 LOPES FERNANDES 08/06/2010 08/09/2010 44452/05 PINTO ROMÃO DE SOUSA CHAVES AND OTHERS 15/06/2010 15/09/2010 24678/06+ FERNANDES FORMIGAL DE ARRIAGA AND 15 OTHER CASES “AGRARIAN REFORM” 13/07/2010 13/10/2010 25038/06 MONTEIRO DE BARROS DE MATTOS E SILVA ADEGAS COELHO AND OTHERS 13/07/2010 19/04/2011 13/10/2010 19/07/2011 38317/06+ SILVA BARREIRA JUNIOR 11/01/2011 11/04/2011 10143/07 SOCIEDADE AGRICOLA DO AMEIXIAL, S.A. 11/01/2011 11/04/2011 44051/07 SOCIEDADE AGRICOLA VALE DE OURO S.A. 11/01/2011 27/03/2012 11/04/2011 27/06/2012 8851/07 SANCHO CRUZ AND 14 OTHER CASES “AGRARIAN REFORM” 18/01/2011 18/04/2011 59423/09 HELENA DA GRACA PINA 15/02/2011 15/05/2011 335/10 COMPANHIA AGRÍCOLA DO MARANHÃO - CAMAR SA 22/02/2011 22/05/2011 10145/07 PASSANHA BRAAMCAMP SOBRAL 12/04/2011 12/07/2011 43359/07 COLARES PEREIRA FERNANDES SOARES 22/05/2012 22/08/2012   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 February 2014 at the 1190th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2013)1217 );   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.