CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 18 juin 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)89 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Twenty one cases against Serbia   Application No. Case Date of the decision 45710/08+ ANDRIC AND 23 OTHER APPLICATIONS 11/12/2012 65052/09 BOZANIC 12/02/2013 46877/08+ BUNARDZIC AND 29 OTHER APPLICATIONS 11/12/2012 50045/08 COROVIC AND 8 OTHER APPLICATIONS 10/07/2012 47324/08 GOGIC AND 8 OTHER APPLICATIONS 19/06/2012 35449/08 GRAHOVAC 13/11/2012 18565/12 GUNJAK 01/10/2013 3548/08 HINIĆ 09/04/2013 17401/09+ HODZIC AND 4 OTHER APPLICATIONS 02/10/2012 3718/09+ HUSOVIC AND 5 OTHER APPLICATIONS 04/09/2012 40411/07 LJUBISAVLJEVIC 20/03/2012 14680/08 MIJAJLOVIĆ 09/04/2013 48833/08+ MOSJSILOVIC AND 29 OTHER APPLICATIONS 06/03/2012 42/10 PERISIC AND 42 OTHER APPLICATIONS 04/09/2012 31169/08 PETKOVIC 06/12/2011 61635/09 RAMICEVIC 05/06/2012 37766/07 RANĐELOVIĆ 26/03/2013 31398/08 TURINSKI 29/01/2013 47893/08+ TUTIC AND 14 OTHER APPLICATIONS 14/02/2012 39882/09 VASOVIC 04/09/2012 57016/08+ VUKOJICIC AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS 11/12/2012   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 June 2014 at the 1203rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.