CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 18 juin 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)87 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Thirty-two cases against Croatia   Application No. Case Date of the decision 65625/11 Stevan ANTONIĆ 28/05/2013 9017/11 Ivan ANZULOVIĆ 28/05/2013 70000/11 BRADIĆ 12/11/2013 70177/11 BURIĆ 02/07/2013 58692/12 ĆURIĆ HRVATINIĆ 22/10/2013 70177/12 GRABERSKI 17/09/2013 61305/09 Ivan Filip GREGOVIĆ 28/05/2013 70398/10 JALUSIC AND OTHERS 16/10/2012 2650/12 JAPUNČIĆ 22/10/2013 40154/12 JURAS 22/10/2013 6279/12 JURIĆ 18/06/2013 51597/12 JUSTAMENT 02/07/2013 58709/11 KLJAJIĆ 17/09/2013 35830/10 Jovanka LOLIĆ 28/05/2013 71647/11 MARIĆ 02/07/2013 24040/10 NATRLIN 18/09/2012 5058/12 PAIĆ AND OTHERS 12/11/2013 28286/10 Alan PRAUNSPERGER 28/05/2013 69384/12 SABLIĆ 22/10/2013 4449/11 ŠARIĆ 22/10/2013 37777/12 SCHUBERT TEPŠIĆ AND OTHERS 12/11/2013 8097/12 SCHWENK MUEHLBAUER 02/07/2013 5562/12 SELJAČKA SLOGA ŠKZ IN LIQUIDATION 02/07/2013 51573/12 ŠKALA 22/10/2013 7736/12 SLADETIĆ 22/10/2013 66229/11 ŠPOLJAR 22/10/2013 23042/12 SZABO 12/11/2013 70265/12+ Stjepan TRUPELJAK and Drago TRUPELJAK 02/07/2013 40165/12 UJEVIĆ AND OTHERS 22/10/2013 64995/11 UŠAJ 02/07/2013 1286/10 VOJNOVIĆ 18/06/2013 58696/12 ZADRAŽIL 17/09/2013   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 June 2014 at the 1203rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.