CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 18 juin 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)90 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Sixteen cases against “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”   Application No. Case Date of the decision 53199/08 ALIEVSKI AND OTHERS 17/09/2013 41050/06 ANTONIEVSKA AND OTHERS 17/09/2013 49966/08+ BLAŽEVSKI AND 3 OTHER APPLICATIONS 02/07/2013 46270/08+ HRISTOVSKI AND 8 OTHER APPLICATIONS 17/09/2013 11795/06 KOTESKA AND OTHERS 17/09/2013 7163/06+ LUTFIU AND 5 OTHER APPLICATIONS 17/09/2013 11775/06 MATICA NA ISELENICI AND 8 OTHER APPLICATIONS 28/05/2013 2454/08 NEŠIK 02/07/2013 5367/06 PAVLOVIK LATAS AND OTHERS AND 4 OTHER APPLICATIONS 29/01/2013 14985/08 PETKOVSKA 01/10/2013 43348/08 PETKOVSKI 02/07/2013 48556/08 RISTESKI AND OTHERS 02/07/2013 54344/07 Angela RISTEVSKA and Goran RISTEVSKI 02/07/2013 43287/08+ RISTOV AND ADEMI 01/10/2013 3758/07 TASEVSKA AND OTHERS 17/09/2013 3921/07 ZUGIK AND 10 OTHER APPLICATIONS 29/01/2013   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 June 2014 at the 1203rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.