CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 juin 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     Communicated on 5 December 2011 and 6 November 2012     THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 41773/09 and 39633/10 Georgeta CRĂIŢĂ against Romania and Costel GACIU against Romania lodged on 20 June 2009 and 8 July 2010 respectively The facts and complaints in these cases have been summarised in the Court’s Statements of facts and Questions to the parties, which are available in HUDOC. QUESTION Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her/his Convention rights on the ground of her/his status as a remand prisoner, pending trial, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8 (see Varnas v. Lithuania , no. 42615/06, 9 July 2013)?   Reference is made to the fact that under the national legislation convicted persons serving sentences in all types of prisons, have the right to conjugal visits, whilst those in pre-trial detention do not have such a right