CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 22 octobre 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)196 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty-eight cases against Turkey   Application No. Case Date of the decision 21319/12 ARAÇ 11/02/2014 10673/12 ARSLAN 28/01/2014 67344/11 BABAYİĞİT 11/02/2014 32004/06 BEYAZTAŞ 10/12/2013 35557/12 BULDUK 28/01/2014 13924/09 ÇAÇAN 10/12/2013 38324/12 ÇELEBİ 28/01/2014 19450/13 ÇETİN 11/02/2014 11869/12 DENİZ 28/01/2014 43690/11 DOĞANTEMUR 28/01/2014 19448/13 DÖNMEZ 11/02/2014 55768/11 DURAN 29/01/2013 78554/11 EKRİ 10/12/2013 67798/11 ER 11/02/2014 55248/10 ERDOĞAN 10/12/2013 18380/09 GÜN 10/12/2013 15810/12 HAZAR 28/01/2014 5488/09 İNAL 10/12/2013 5809/09 İREZ 10/12/2013 10551/12 İRİTAŞ 28/01/2014 44158/09 IŞIKLI 28/01/2014 33186/09 İZCİ AND DÖNDÜ 10/12/2013 13583/12 KAYHAN 28/01/2014 58774/11 KÖKLÜ 28/01/2014 67895/11 ÖZCAN 28/01/2014 20084/12 ŞAHİN 11/02/2014 19427/13 ŞİRİN 11/02/2014 19451/13 YARDIMCI 11/02/2014   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 October 2014 at the 1210th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.