CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 4 décembre 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)267 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Forty cases against Poland   Application No. Case Date of the decision 41950/11 CHUCHLA 02/07/2013 37476/04 CYRAN 02/07/2013 31175/04 DĄBEK 02/07/2013 19974/12 DRZEWIECCY 02/07/2013 42956/04 DUDEK 02/07/2013 65626/10 GESZKE 09/07/2013 17901/05 GUMNA 02/07/2013 28861/04 JASEK 02/07/2013 28958/05 KIEŁB 02/07/2013 43110/04 KIEŁB 02/07/2013 40175/04 KIPA 09/07/2013 37814/04 KOSTUR 02/07/2013 10844/05 KREMPA 02/07/2013 38252/05 KRÓL 02/07/2013 3721/05 KURCZYK 09/07/2013 32612/05 LIŻEWSKA 02/07/2013 32137/04 MARSZAŁEK 02/07/2013 37495/04 MARZEC 09/07/2013 37833/04 MAZIARZ 02/07/2013 21671/05 MIŁOŚ 02/07/2013 25559/11 ORŁOWSKI 04/02/2014 26578/05 OSMOŁA 02/07/2013 5724/11 PAWŁOWSKI 09/07/2013 61730/10 PIECUCH 02/07/2013 15218/05 PIĘTA 02/07/2013 7398/05 PIKUL 02/07/2013 70142/10 PODKAŃSKI 09/07/2013 22167/05 POGODA 02/07/2013 41233/05 PRZEPIÓRA 09/07/2013 54075/11 RADEMACHER 18/06/2013 43802/09 RAFACZ 02/07/2013 3772/05 RYNIEWICZ 02/07/2013 39453/09 SEWERYN 21/05/2013 43607/04 STECYK 02/07/2013 26389/12 SUCHECKI 02/07/2013 27703/05 WÓJCIK 02/07/2013 44317/04 ZAREMBA 02/07/2013 29183/06 ZAWADZKA 02/07/2013 24810/11 ZIELIŃSKI 21/05/2013 8594/05 ZIOBRO 09/07/2013   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 December 2014 at the 1214th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.