CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 26 novembre 2014

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s2D57E2E { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase }     Communicated on 30 October 2012 and 26 November 2014   FIRST SECTION Application no. 50175/12 M. against Croatia lodged on 3 July 2012 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Have the leads provided by the first applicant Z.M. (interview of 19   December 2002), the second applicant D.M. (interview of 11 July 2003), I. D. (interview of 28 July 2003), as well as other former Croatian soldiers interviewed in 2003, about Š. (possibly N. Š.) and B. (possibly V. or G.) and their commanders I. M. and D.P., being the alleged direct perpetrators of the abduction and killing of the applicants’ close relative S. M., been followed by the national authorities? If not, what were the reasons for that?