CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 18 février 2015

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)21 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty four cases against Romania   Application No. Case Date of the decision 22064/13 A.A.R. 27/05/2014 20763/08 Nicolae AMARIEI 27/05/2014 57325/13 Elena APOSTOAE 01/07/2014 54294/09 Petru BALAJ 27/05/2014 65133/11 Ovidiu Dumitru BORZAN 27/05/2014 22326/11 Mircea Bogdan BOTEZATU 27/05/2014 35845/13 Gavrilă CEUCA 24/06/2014 26220/06 Cristian CHIHAIA 27/05/2014 33045/09 Romulus Petru COSTEA 24/06/2014 16178/07 Tiberiu Ioan DAVID 27/05/2014 59187/09 Maria Eugenia DINU 27/05/2014 65525/09 Ilie GHIŢĂ 27/05/2014 36773/13 Radu Andrei IONESCU and Barbu Serban IONESCU 24/06/2014 32993/13 Ioan JURCA and others 27/05/2014 74694/12 Oprina MITRICĂ and Victor MITRICA 27/05/2014 26578/08 Dorin NECULIŢĂ 27/05/2014 24073/13 Valerică NISTOR 27/05/2014 35432/13 Nicoleta-Maria PĂȘCAN 24/06/2014 499/08 Neculai PARASCHIV 24/06/2014 46311/09 Florian RAŢ 24/06/2014 77813/12 S.C. SVE OSTRA S.R.L. 15/04/2014 25834/10 SIOMAX S.P.R.L. 15/04/2014 58193/10 Aurel URSUŢA 27/05/2014 9134/10 Lucia ZGLĂVUŢĂ 24/06/2014   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 February 2015 at the 1220th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.