CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 février 2015
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-152945
- Date
- 16 février 2015
- Publication
- 16 février 2015
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both }     Communicated on 16 February 2015   FIRST SECTION Application no. 18532/12 Darko LEŠTEK against Croatia lodged on 24 February 2012 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Darko Leštek, is a Croatian national, who was born in 1962 and lives in Zagreb. He is represented before the Court by Ms   K.   Abramović, a lawyer practising in Zagreb. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. On 23 November 2005 the Zagreb Minor Offences Court ( Prekršajni sud u Zagrebu ) found the applicant guilty on charges of minor offence of family violence for having verbally abused and assaulted his wife on 14 November 2005 in their house in front of their child. The applicant was sentenced to thirty days’ imprisonment and ordered not to approach his wife in the period of four months. On 24 July 2006 the applicant was indicted in the Zagreb Municipal Criminal Court ( Općinski kazneni sud u Zagrebu ) on charges of several acts of family violence including the event of 14 November 2005 when he verbally abused and assaulted his wife in their house in front of their child. On 4 March 2009 the Zagreb Municipal Criminal Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to ten months’ imprisonment suspended for two years. On 16 February 2011 the Zagreb County Court ( Županijski sud u Zagrebu ) upheld the applicant’s conviction but lower his sentence to nine months’ imprisonment suspended for two years. The applicant then lodged a constitutional complaint before the Constitutional Court ( Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske ) complaining, inter alia , that he was tried and sentence twice for the same offence. On 21 September 2011 the Constitutional Court declared the applicant’s constitutional complaint inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded. The decision of the Constitutional Court was served on the applicant’s representative on 3 October 2011. COMPLAINT The applicant complains, under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7, that he was tried and convicted twice of the same offence.       QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant been convicted twice for the same offence in the territory of the respondent State, as prohibited by Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7? If so, did the proceedings fall within the exceptions envisaged by Article 4 §   2 of Protocol No. 7?   The Government are requested to submit two copies of the relevant documents concerning the applicant’s case.  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 16 février 2015
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-152945
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel