CEDHCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG17
CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 12 mars 2015
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-153264
- Date
- 12 mars 2015
- Publication
- 12 mars 2015
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleRespondent State urged to take individual measures
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s86A03557 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; widows:0; orphans:0 } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s33510801 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; widows:0; orphans:0 } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)43 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Ilgar Mammadov against Azerbaijan   Application Case Judgment of Final on 15172/13 ILGAR MAMMADOV 22/05/2014 13/10/2014   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 March 2015 at the 1222nd meeting of Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter “the Convention”);   Recalling that the violations found in this case, and in particular that of Article 18 in conjunction with Article 5, challenge the foundation of the criminal proceedings against the applicant who is an opposition politician, expressed its very serious concern about the fact that the applicant is still detained despite the obligation of Azerbaijan to comply with the judgment of the Court;   Reiterated with insistence its call to the authorities to ensure without further delay the applicant’s release and to adopt the other measures necessary to erase the consequences of the violations established, in particular that of Article 18 taken in conjunction with Article 5 of the Convention;   Noted, in this regard, that the applicant’s appeal against his conviction is still pending before the Supreme Court, and expressed its deep concern about the fact that the Supreme Court has postponed its consideration sine die ;   Reiterated its call upon the Azerbaijani authorities to provide, without delay, concrete and comprehensive information on the measures taken and/or planned to avoid that criminal proceedings are instituted without a legitimate basis and to ensure effective judicial review of such attempts by the Prosecutor’s office, as well as to prevent new violations of the presumption of innocence by the Prosecutor’s office and members of the government;   Decided to resume consideration of these issues at its 1230th meeting (June 2015) (DH).  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
- Formation
- 17
- Date
- 12 mars 2015
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-153264
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral