CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 avril 2015

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 12 September 2014 and 15 April 2015         FIRST SECTION Application no. 52286/14 Abdulazhon Mamadzhanovich ISAKOV against Russia lodged on 22 July 2014     The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC.   QUESTIONS 1.     Is the application compatible with the provisions of the Convention, ratione personae ? In particular, does Ms N. Yermolayeva have legal standing before the Court for the purpose of acting on behalf of Mr   Abdulazhon Isakov, having regard, inter alia , to the fact that he did not issue an authority form to her (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§   102-03, ECHR   2014)?   2.     As regards the Court’s earlier request to the Government to provide an entire copy of the criminal investigation file concerning the abduction and disappearance of Mr Abdulazhon Isakov, does the Government’s failure to comply with the said request amount to Russia’s failure to cooperate with the Court, as required by Article   38 of the Convention?