CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 22 avril 2015

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 5 February 2013 and 22 April 2015   THIRD SECTION Application no. 24591/07 Dorinel Mihai MUCEA against Romania lodged on 4 June 2007 The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s decision of 5 February 2013, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION The parties are invited to inform the Court of the evolution of the court proceedings at domestic level after the observations submitted on 15   November 2013 and to submit, as soon as they become available, copies of the judgments adopted by the High Court of Cassation and Justice in the applicant’s case on 3 December 2013 and 27 January 2015 as well as of the applicant’s reasons for appeal on points of law ( recurs ). The parties are also invited to submit their potential observations concerning the new factual information in light of the applicant’s complaint about the alleged unlawful interceptions of his phone conversations under Article 8 of the Convention.