CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 juin 2015

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 3 December 2014 and 25 June 2015   FIRST SECTION Applications nos 69981/14 and 81553/12 Rasul JAFAROV against Azerbaijan and Hilal MAMMADOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 10 October 2014 and 19 November 2012 respectively     The facts and complaints in these cases have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC.   QUESTION   1.     In view of the suspension of the legal licence of the applicants’ lawyer, has there been any hindrance by the State in the present cases with the effective exercise of the applicants’ right of application, ensured by Article 34 of the Convention?