CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 24 septembre 2015

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s87F54B8B { height:5.9pt } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE8AF05CF { height:5.95pt } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s74384AE5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.4pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)155 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Thirty-four cases against Italy   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 24818/03 ARMANDO IANNELLI 12/02/2013 12/05/2013 20619/03+ ASCIERTO AND BUFFOLINO 05/11/2013 05/11/2013 15015/03+ BENCIVENGA AND OTHERS 05/11/2013 05/11/2013 18477/03 TIZIANO BIANCHI 02/11/2010 02/02/2011 19876/03+ BONALZOO S.R.L. 07/12/2010 07/03/2011 62156/00 BONASIA AND POZZI 08/07/2008 08/10/2008 24817/03 ANGELO CARUSO 02/04/2013 02/04/2013 3978/03 CONCERIA MADERA S.R.L. No. 2 21/09/2010 21/12/2010 43465/02 COOPERATIVA ‘SANNIO VERDE’ S.R.L. 15/11/2012 15/11/2012 32671/03 DI BRITA 14/10/2008 14/01/2009 1452/03 FONTANA 13/11/2008 13/02/2009 32740/02+ GALASSO AND OTHERS 16/07/2013 16/07/2013 28104/02+ GHIROTTI AND BENASSI 06/04/2010 06/07/2010 13175/03 GIUSTI 18/10/2011 18/01/2012 11213/04 LANDINO 16/03/2010 16/06/2010 24886/03 MAIO 18/03/2008 18/06/2008 37947/02+ MARTINETTI AND CAVAZZUTI 20/04/2010 20/07/2010 32810/02 MARZOLA CENTRI DI FISIOKINESITERAPIA S.A.S. 16/03/2010 16/06/2010 62250/00 MAUGERI SILVIO 08/07/2008 08/10/2008 37197/03 MEZZAPESA AND PLATI 24/04/2012 24/04/2012 34389/02+ PACIFICO AND OTHERS 15/11/2012 15/02/2013 39567/02 PARENTI (HEIR) AND DEIDDA 25/09/2012 25/09/2012 27036/03+ SALVATORE AND OTHERS 18/01/2011 18/01/2011 11013/04+ SANCHIRICO AND LAMORTE 16/03/2010 16/06/2010 44031/02+ STREGA ALBERTI BENEVENTO S.P.A. 09/11/2010 09/02/2011 64897/01 ZULLO ERNESTINA 29/03/2006 Grand Chamber 20191/03 ARAGOSA 18/12/2007 18/03/2008 62354/00 BIEFFE RIFUGI ANTIATOMICI S.R.L. 08/07/2008 08/10/2008 45836/99 CAPONE AND CENTRELLA 16/10/2007 31/03/2008 62155/00 PROVIDE S.R.L. 05/07/2007 05/10/2007 39933/03 BUONFARDIECI 18/12/2007 18/03/2008 41062/05 CAPRIATI 26/07/2011 26/07/2011 20193/03+ PISCITELLI AND OTHERS 12/10/2010 12/01/2011 36624/02 SILVERI No.2 19/10/2010 19/01/2011   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 September 2015 at the 1236th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling that in these cases the Court found a violation of the Convention only in relation to the insufficient amount of compensation awarded by domestic jurisdictions following “Pinto” proceedings;   Recalling also the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations; Having noted that the just satisfaction, where awarded, has been paid by the government of the respondent State and that the domestic proceedings covered by the “Pinto” procedures are terminated;   Having also noted that the Italian jurisdictions now constantly award, under the “Pinto” Law, compensation that is compliant with the case-law of the Court;   Recalling that the Committee continues its examination of the outstanding questions relating to the “Pinto” remedy (in particular, delay in the payment of the compensation; excessive length of “Pinto” proceedings; access to the “Pinto” remedy made conditional upon the termination of the main proceedings and no possibility for compensation for proceedings that have lasted six years or less) within the framework of the other cases of the Giuseppe Mostacciuolo group and the Gaglione and Others case,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed above and   DECIDES to close their examination.