CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 24 septembre 2015

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)150 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty-two cases against Romania   Application No. Case Date of the decision 68123/12 Attila BERKI 16/12/2014 17175/14 C.O. 03/02/2015 63204/12 Marcel-Marius DĂNILĂ ALEXA 16/12/2014 232/08 Gheorghe DASCĂLU 23/09/2014 43469/13 Eugenia DEACONU and Gheorghe DEACONU 16/12/2014 26099/08 Mihai Klepper DUŢĂ 20/01/2015 62755/11 Laurențiu ENCIU 17/02/2015 44380/13 Ionel ENE 16/12/2014 55520/13 Ion IORGULESCU 20/01/2015 75816/13 Petru Dorin MĂRGINEAN AND OTHERS 20/01/2015 59030/13 Ion MECHE 17/02/2015 5428/14 Rodica NEAGU 03/02/2015 4754/12 Mihai NISTOR and Ștefan Mircea POP 07/10/2014 25423/03 OLARU AND OTHERS 03/07/2012 44676/08 Panait PRAISLER 03/02/2015 75758/12 Virgil Constantin PURCĂRESCU 16/12/2014 66421/09 Alexandru Ciprian RUSU 25/11/2014 20967/14 Ciprian Robert SAVA 20/01/2015 78978/13 Ana SÎRBEANU 20/01/2015 59683/13 Paolo Luke SMART 20/01/2015 16980/12+ Remus TUDOR and Remus TUDOR 20/01/2015 19501/14 Gheorghe VIDA 20/01/2015   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 September 2015 at the 1236th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.