CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 20 octobre 2015
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-158667
- Date
- 20 octobre 2015
- Publication
- 20 octobre 2015
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sB853CD33 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal } Communicated on 20 October 2015   SECOND SECTION Application no. 25149/13 Mato MRAZOVIĆ and others against Croatia lodged on 20 March 2013 STATEMENT OF FACTS A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. In 1984 the applicants brought a civil action in the Zagreb Municipal Court against company T., their employer, seeking payment of salary arrears in United States dollars (USD). On 1 October 2002 the Zagreb Municipal Court allowed the applicants’ claim in part, ordering the defendant to pay the applicants’ salary arrears. On 28 December 2005 the Zagreb Municipal Court adopted a supplementary judgment, ordering the defendant to pay interest on the salary arrears, in addition to the applicants’ legal costs. On 6 June 2006 the Zagreb County Court, upon an appeal by the defendant, upheld the first-instance judgment of 1 October 2002, while it quashed (in part) the supplementary judgment of 28 December 2005, and ordered a fresh examination of the case with regard to the costs of the proceedings. It held that the first-instance court should have applied the USD exchange rate which had been valid on the date of the first-instance judgment, and not a different rate for each procedural action. On 4 May 2007 the Zagreb Municipal Court ordered company T. to pay the applicants a further sum of 32,123.11 Croatian kunas (HRK) in respect of the costs of the proceedings. Upon an appeal by the applicants, on 24 July 2007 the Zagreb County Court quashed the decision of the Zagreb Municipal Court and remitted the case, instructing the first-instance court to apply the USD exchange rate which had been valid on the date on which it had concluded the trial, rather than a different rate for each procedural action. On 12 April 2011 the Zagreb Municipal Court dismissed the applicants’ claim, finding that the amount paid thus far to the applicants in respect of the costs of litigation was already sufficient, and that the relevant daily exchange rate should be applied for each procedural action. On 13 September 2011 the Zagreb County Court dismissed an appeal by the applicants and upheld the first-instance decision of 12 April 2011. The applicants then lodged an “ordinary” appeal on points of law under section 381(1)(1) of the Civil Procedure Act and an “extraordinary” appeal on points of law under section 382(2) of the Civil Procedure Act. On 15 November 2011 the Supreme Court declared the applicants’ appeals on points of law inadmissible. The “ordinary” appeal was declared inadmissible by reason of the value of the claim ( ratione valoris ). However, no reasons were given for declaring the applicants’ “extraordinary” appeal inadmissible. On 13 September 2012 the Constitutional Court declared a constitutional complaint by the applicants inadmissible. COMPLAINT The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that their right to a fair hearing was violated when the Supreme Court declared their appeal on points of law under section 382(2) of the Civil Procedure Act inadmissible without giving adequate reasons.     QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the Supreme Court deprive the applicants of their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention when it failed to give reasons for declaring their “extraordinary” appeal on points of law inadmissible?         Appendix       Mato MRAZOVIĆ born on 18/01/1955 is a Croatian national, lives in Zagreb and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Ankica BEKINA born on 18/09/1948 is a Croatian national, lives in Gornja Stubica and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Nezir CEROVAC born on 18/09/1956 is a Croatian national, lives in Mrkotic and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Mustafa HAMIDOVIC born on 05/02/1972 is a Croatian national, lives in Medida Gornja and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Osman HAMIDOVIC born on 03/01/1967 is a Croatian national, lives in Medida Gornja and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Hasan IMSIROVIC born on 10/03/1979 is a Croatian national, lives in Medida Gornja and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Jasmin KECANOVIC born on 25/01/1969 is a Croatian national, lives in Zagreb and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Jasminka KECANOVIC born on 13/08/1964 is a Croatian national, lives in Zagreb and represented by G.VODOPIVEC     Stjepan KRZNARIC born on 11/08/1956 is a Croatian national, lives in Lučko and represented by G.VODOPIVEC Petko MILINCIC born on 02/04/1954 is a Croatian national, lives in Krizevci and represented by G.VODOPIVEC Jozo TOMAS is a Croatian national, lives in Brinje and represented by G.VODOPIVEC Ivan UGARKOVIC born on 14/04/1942 is a Croatian national, lives in Brinje and represented by G.VODOPIVECCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 20 octobre 2015
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-158667
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel