CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 17 novembre 2015

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)199 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Nineteen cases against Hungary   Application No. Case Date of the decision 24212/09 Gábor HAVAS 10/03/2015 68392/14 Gyula HOLLÓSI 07/04/2015 12166/11 Áron KISS 21/04/2015 32805/09 Péter KUN 17/02/2015 49069/13 Rezső AND Éva KÚTVÁRI 19/05/2015 69814/13 Rezsőné KUTVÁRI 19/05/2015 13071/11 László NAGY 07/04/2015 74821/13 Béla POHÁNKA 19/05/2015 66003/09 György PURGER 10/03/2015 34306/10 REKULTIM KFT 07/04/2015 80988/13 Csaba SÁRAI 19/05/2015 17007/11 Tímea SOMOSINÉ TÉSENYI 21/04/2015 11604/09 Lászlóné SZABÓ-NÉMETH 10/03/2015 27070/10 Katalin SZAMOSI 07/04/2015 50461/13 János SZEKERES AND OTHERS 19/05/2015 724/11 András TARTALLY AND Emőke TARTALLYNÉ TIHANYI 07/04/2015 49177/13 Sándor VISNYEI 19/05/2015 5454/11 Róbert WEIMBER 07/04/2015 11082/09 Jánosné ZSOLDOS 10/03/2015   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 November 2015 at the 1240th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.