CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 9 décembre 2015

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)222 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in 30 cases against Austria   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 45369/07 RAMBAUSKE 28/01/2010 28/04/2010 13471/06 ALMESBERGER 10/12/2009 10/03/2010 36650/05 BACHMAYER 28/10/2010 28/01/2011 41113/08 BARTHOFER 17/04/2012 17/04/2012 18283/06 FRAGNER 23/09/2010 23/12/2010 38032/05 GIERLINGER 29/11/2007 29/02/2008 20597/04 GÜRSOY 05/06/2008 05/09/2008 5455/06 HALL 06/03/2012 06/06/2012 37301/03 HAUSER-SPORN 07/12/2006 23/05/2007 56483/00 JANCIKOVA 07/04/2005 07/07/2005 33928/05 KLUG 15/01/2009 15/04/2009 2834/09 KÜCHER 05/02/2015 05/02/2015 28034/04 MÜLLER No. 2 18/09/2008 18/12/2008 2884/04 ORTNER 31/05/2007 31/08/2007 12702/08 OTTO 22/10/2009 22/01/2010 35109/06+ PENIAS AND ORTMAIR 18/10/2011 18/01/2012 6379/08 PFEIFENBERGER 04/10/2011 04/10/2011 20089/06 PUCHSTEIN 28/01/2010 28/04/2010 37040/02 RIEPL 03/02/2005 03/05/2005 25166/05 SCHNEIDER 31/07/2008 31/10/2008 18015/03 SCHÜTTE 26/07/2007 26/10/2007 45322/08 SEIDL AND OTHERS 19/12/2013 19/12/2013 20087/06 STECHAUNER 28/01/2010 28/04/2010 63463/09 STÖTTINGER 10/07/2014 10/07/2014 25929/05 STROBEL 04/06/2009 04/09/2009 18294/03 STEMPFER 26/07/2007 26/10/2007 8140/04 VITZTHUM 26/07/2007 26/10/2007 5339/07 VON PEZOLD 28/10/2010 11/04/2011 28571/06 VR-BANK STUTTGART EG 20/05/2010 20/08/2010 5335/07 WURZER 06/03/2012 06/06/2012   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 December 2015at the 1243rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2015)1270 );   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.