CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 24 février 2016

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s6304BEC7 { color:#545454 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)12 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Twenty-eight cases against Hungary   Application No. Case Date of the decision 60658/11 László BARACSKAI 07/07/2015 35440/11 Mihály BAUKÓ 07/07/2015 27617/10 Margit BOGÁTINÉ LÁSZLÓ 07/07/2015 40134/11 János BRAZOVICS 08/09/2015 1725/11 Györgyné BRUZSA 07/07/2015 1925/11 DOT-ING KFT 07/07/2015 23143/11 FALCO-2000 KFT 07/07/2015 51836/09 Pál FARKAS 10/03/2015 17885/12 Zsolt FEJES 08/09/2015 132/11 Sándor FODOR 07/07/2015 3594/11 Róza GUBÁSNÉ JÁNOSSY 07/07/2015 70701/11 Attila JAKUS 07/07/2015 40997/11 István KATONA AND Ildikó KATONÁNÉ PINTÉR 07/07/2015 31620/11 Ernő KATONA 07/07/2015 67967/10 Péter Gábor KOVÁCS 21/04/2015 72830/11 Ádám LÖFFLER 08/09/2015 27026/12 Józsefné NEUBERGER 08/09/2015 49561/11 Viktor PÁRICSI 07/07/2015 20240/12 Gyula PETRECZ 08/09/2015 40857/11 László REKVÉNYI 07/07/2015 74762/13 Margit RÉTHY 19/05/2015 34918/11 Ida SAMU 07/07/2015 46746/11 Tamás SZALAY 07/07/2015 28975/11 Ágnes Irén TÁRNOK 07/07/2015 3187/08 Emese TÓTH 02/06/2015 40882/11 Mária TÓTH 07/07/2015 73510/11 Csaba Nándorné VÁRI 07/07/2015 56284/09 József and Józsefné VIZSY 02/06/2015   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 February 2016 at the 1248th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.