CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 mars 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 14 March 2016   SECOND SECTION Application no. 57985/10 Özgür Azad İNCİ against Turkey lodged on 1 September 2010 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application mainly concerns the lack of legal assistance to the applicant during his police custody (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no.   36391/02, 27 November 2008). QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to his conviction on 31 March 2010 (decision no.   2009/19520 E and 2010/3697 K), has there been a breach of Article   6 §   3   (c) of the Convention as a result of the lack of legal assistance available to the applicant during his detention in police custody between 9 and 20   October 1999 (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, §§   45 ‑ 63, 27   November 2008)?