CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 13 avril 2016

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)69 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty nine cases against Poland   Application No. Case Date of the decision 28653/13 Mariusz BOGURSKI 02/07/2015 2173/13 Bartłomiej BOJAR 09/06/2015 62572/14 Krzysztof Adam CIEŚLAK 09/06/2015 8286/13 Sławomir DĄBROWSKI 02/06/2015 72690/12 Ryszard DATA 14/09/2015 9937/13 Mirosław DAWIDOWSKI 09/06/2015 38211/13 Andrzej DYKBAN 02/06/2015 25609/14 Robert DZIURKOWSKI 23/06/2015 30699/13 Kamil GÓRECKI 02/07/2015 72600/11 Robert GRONKIEWICZ 02/07/2015 16008/13 Marek HAMRYSZAK 09/06/2015 73891/13 Marcin JANKOWSKI 30/06/2015 17460/13 Dariusz KAMIŃSKI 09/06/2015 63294/12 Jacek KAZIMIERCZUK 16/06/2015 42432/13 Robert NIEZGODA 23/06/2015 29522/13 Krzysztof NOWAK 02/06/2015 1259/13 Łukasz PERTKIEWICZ 02/06/2015 8951/14 Robert Cezary PRZYBYLSKI 02/06/2015 33779/14 Dariusz RATKOWSKI 23/06/2015 68730/12 Dariusz ROGUSKI 09/06/2015 72872/12 Robert RUDNIK 16/06/2015 21868/12 Artur SIERAŃSKI 16/06/2015 37560/13 Piotr STACHOWICZ 09/06/2015 63797/12 Sławomir Franciszek STEINKE 02/06/2015 49676/13 Tomasz STOŻEK 02/07/2015 11378/12 Robert WERNER 02/06/2015 2037/14 Kazimierz WOŁKOWSKI and Krystian JACYNO 14/09/2015 8988/13 Michał WOŹNIAK 02/06/2015 76137/13 Mariusz ZELEK 02/07/2015   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 13 April 2016 at the 1253rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.