CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 8 juin 2016

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sA3C2123C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:28.35pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s4E34B50A { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s1C2B10C2 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s23CD0580 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s70B41AB9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)149 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Forty-nine cases against Portugal   (See Appendix for the list of cases)   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 June 2016 at the 1259th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention due to the excessive length of civil, administrative or criminal proceedings established in these cases;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having noted that the just satisfaction, where awarded, has been paid by the government of the respondent State;   Noting with satisfaction the major legislative measures adopted by the Portuguese authorities, which demonstrate their commitment to pursue their efforts to resolve the problem of excessive length of judicial proceedings;   Noting also that encouraging results have been obtained and have been consolidated with regard to criminal proceedings, first instance civil declaratory proceedings and civil proceedings in general before the higher courts;   Recalling further that the Court recognised the effectiveness of the remedy established in Portugal for obtaining compensation in respect of excessive length of proceedings;   Noting that the Committee will continue to follow, within the framework of several recent cases, the outstanding questions concerning the impact of the adopted measures on the length of the proceedings in which no positive trend has been observed to date;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed below and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.       Appendix – list of cases   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 34422/97 OLIVEIRA MODESTO AND OTHERS 08/06/2000 08/09/2000 12363/10 DOMINGOS MARQUES RIBEIRO MAÇARICO 17/01/2012 17/04/2012 14886/03 MONTEIRO DA CRUZ 17/01/2006 17/04/2006 15601/09 CUNHA OLIVEIRA 20/09/2011 20/09/2011 18545/06 SEQUEIRA GABRIELA 20/10/2009 20/01/2010 19881/06 CASTRO FERREIRA LEITE 01/12/2009 10/05/2010 21217/09 CARDOSO OLIVEIRA 04/02/2014 04/02/2014 22851/11 MARQUES JERÓNIMO BARATA 12/03/2013 12/03/2013 2489/09 FLORES CARDOSO 29/05/2012 29/08/2012 26655/09 AREDE RUIVO 12/07/2011 12/07/2011 30358/08 ALVES FERREIRA 27/05/2010 27/08/2010 30532/12 PEREIRA SANTOS 04/02/2014 04/02/2014 32020/10 PINHO LOPES 23/10/2012 23/10/2012 33197/09 ALEXANDRE 20/11/2012 20/02/2013 34676/13 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS - TRANSPORTES AÉREOS, S.A. 08/12/2015 08/12/2015 39607/10 MANSO ROGEIRO 12/03/2013 12/03/2013 43146/11 GOMES ALMEIDA HENRIQUES MOURA 12/03/2013 12/03/2013 43641/09 VITOR MANUEL TOME MONTEIRO AND OTHERS 26/07/2011 26/07/2011 44230/10 PORTUGAL AND CORRÊA DE BARROS 08/11/2012 08/11/2012 44298/98 TOURTIER 14/02/2002 14/05/2002 47001/10 ESTEVES MONTEIRO AND NUNES REMESSO MONTEIRO 08/11/2012 08/11/2012 47031/10 PINHEIRO SILVESTRE 23/10/2012 23/10/2012 48187/99 ROSA MARQUES AND OTHERS 25/07/2002 25/10/2002 48956/99 GIL LEAL PEREIRA 31/10/2002 31/01/2003 49185/13 MENDES 30/10/2014 30/10/2014 49279/99 KONCEPT-CONSELHO EM COMUNICAÇÃO E SENSIBILIZAÇÃO DE PÚBLICOS, LDA 31/10/2002 31/01/2003 49671/99 FERREIRA DA NAVE 07/11/2002 07/02/2003 50775/99 SOUSA MARINHO AND MARINHO MEIRELES PINTO 03/04/2003 03/07/2003 51806/99 FIGUEIREDO SIMOES 30/01/2003 30/04/2003 52412/99 MARQUES NUNES 20/02/2003 20/05/2003 52657/99 TEXTILE TRADERS, LIMITED 27/02/2003 27/05/2003 53534/99 ESTEVES 03/04/2003 03/07/2003 53795/00 FARINHA MARTINS 10/07/2003 10/10/2003 53937/00 FERREIRA ALVES 27/02/2003 27/05/2003 53997/00 DIAS DA SILVA AND GOMES RIBEIRO MARTINS 27/03/2003 27/06/2003 54566/00 MOREIRA & FERREIRINHA, LDA AND OTHERS 26/06/2003 26/09/2003 54926/00 COSTA RIBEIRO 30/04/2003 30/07/2003 55081/00 NEVES FERREIRA SANDE E CASTRO AND OTHERS 16/10/2003 16/01/2004 55340/00 SOCIEDADE AGRÍCOLA DO PERAL AND OTHERS 31/07/2003 31/10/2003 56110/00 FROTAL-ALUGUER DE EQUIPAMENTOS S.A. 04/12/2003 04/03/2004 56345/00 FERREIRA ALVES No. 2 04/12/2003 04/03/2004 57323/00 PENA 18/12/2003 18/03/2004 58294/08 ARMANDO DE JESUS MATEUS 17/01/2012 17/01/2012 58617/00 GARCIA DA SILVA 29/04/2004 29/07/2004 59017/00 SOARES FERNANDES 08/04/2004 08/07/2004 6015/09 ASSUNCAO SANTOS 26/06/2012 26/06/2012 60786/10 VIEIRA GOMES BEZERRA 28/01/2014 28/01/2014 6655/07 FERREIRA ARAÚJO DO VALE 27/10/2009 27/01/2010 9223/10 PIMENTEL LOURENÇO 23/10/2012 23/10/2012