CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 8 juin 2016

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sA0DC6FD2 { font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#333333 } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sC215C3BC { color:#0069d6 } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .sCA654B4E { font-size:6pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s116BEA21 { font-size:8pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)150 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Thirty six cases against Romania   (see Appendix for the list of cases)   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 June 2016 at the 1259th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Articles 2, 3 and 13 of the Convention established on account of the abuse suffered by the applicants or their relatives at the hands of law-enforcement officials, the ineffectiveness of the criminal investigations and proceedings and the absence of an effective remedy as regards this abuse; having moreover regard to the violations of Article 14 taken together with Articles 3 and/or 13 established on account of the racially-motivated ill-treatment inflicted to an applicant of Roma origin [1] and/or the failure of the authorities to investigate such motives; finally having regard to the violations of Articles 6, paragraph 1, 8 and 34 found in the cases of Bursuc , Georgescu , Damian-Burueană and Damian , Iambor (No. 1) and Ianoş ;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having examined the information provided by the government as regards the individual measures in these cases (see DH-DD(2016)554 and DH-DD(2016)461 ) and noted, in the light of this information, that no individual measure is any longer possible or required in these cases; having moreover noted that the just satisfaction, where awarded, was paid by the government of the respondent State;   Noting with satisfaction the measures adopted by the Romanian authorities to prevent deaths and ill-treatment at the hands of law-enforcement officials, including the establishment of an appropriate legal framework as regards fundamental safeguards against ill-treatment and the efforts made to ensure that this framework is applied by the relevant authorities;   Welcoming in this respect the authorities’ commitment to continue improving this framework and ensuring its strict application in respect to any person deprived of liberty by law-enforcement agencies;   Welcoming the measures adopted to enhance the effectiveness of the criminal investigations conducted into allegations of ill-treatment by law-enforcement officials and noting the reinforced monitoring of their implementation by the General Prosecutor’s Office;   Noting also with interest the authorities’ commitment to ensure an adequate response by the relevant authorities to allegations of ill-treatment, in particular those motivated by racial prejudice, by taking into account the recommendations of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the work of the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe in this field;   Noting finally that the general measures required in response to the other violations of the Convention established in some of these cases are or were examined in the context of the groups of cases Vlad and Others and Bota (closed by Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)27) and of the cases of Varga (closed by Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)23) and Gagiu (closed by Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)93 );   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.       Appendix – list of cases   Application No. Case Jugement of Final on 46430/99 BARBU ANGHELESCU No. 1 05/10/2004 05/01/2005 10778/02 NIŢĂ 04/11/2008 06/04/2009 11014/05 SERBAN 10/01/2012 10/04/2012 12717/09 FLĂMÎNZEANU (No. 2) 04/11/2014 04/02/2015 13524/05 PETRUŞ IACOB 04/12/2012 04/03/2013 14526/03 LUPAŞCU 04/11/2008 04/02/2009 1454/09 DOICIU 05/05/2015 05/08/2015 2040/12 CHINEZ 17/03/2015 17/06/2015 24857/03 ROSCA ANTON CATALIN 15/02/2011 15/05/2011 25230/03 GEORGESCU 13/05/2008 13/08/2008 25783/03 ANDREŞAN 30/10/2012 30/01/2013 33038/04 STOIAN 08/07/2014 08/10/2014 3626/10 BIRGEAN 14/01/2014 14/04/2014 37554/06 ROSIORU 10/01/2012 10/04/2012 37971/02 RUPA No. 2 19/07/2011 19/10/2011 40549/11 POEDE 15/09/2015 15/12/2015 41775/06 ŞERCĂU 05/06/2012 05/09/2012 42066/98 BURSUC 12/10/2004 12/01/2005 42722/02 STOICA 04/03/2008 04/06/2008 43247/02 MELINTE 09/11/2006 09/02/2007 4390/03 GHIGA CHIUJDEA 05/10/2010 05/01/2011 45661/99 CARABULEA 13/07/2010 13/10/2010 47615/11 VEREŞ 24/03/2015 24/06/2015 48254/99 COBZARU 26/07/2007 26/10/2007 49234/99 DUMITRU POPESCU No. 1 26/04/2007 26/07/2007 49608/08 ARCHIP 27/09/2011 27/12/2011 54247/07 GHIŢĂ 23/10/2012 23/01/2013 57365/12 ANTON 19/05/2015 19/08/2015 57467/10 SAMACHIȘĂ 16/07/2015 16/10/2015 64536/01 IAMBOR No. 1 24/06/2008 24/09/2008 65804/09 ANDRIŞCĂ 03/02/2015 03/05/2015 6773/02 DAMIAN-BURUEANĂ AND DAMIAN 26/05/2009 26/08/2009 69582/12 MICLEA 13/10/2015 13/01/2016 70555/10 ION BĂLĂŞOIU 17/02/2015 17/05/2015 71090/01 OLTEANU 14/04/2009 14/07/2009 8258/05 IANOS 12/07/2011 12/10/2011     [1] The terms “Roma and Travellers” are being used at the Council of Europe to encompass the wide diversity of the groups covered by the work of the Council of Europe in this field: on the one hand a) Roma, Sinti/Manush, Calé, Kaale, Romanichals, Boyash/Rudari; b) Balkan Egyptians (Egyptians and Ashkali); c) Eastern groups (Dom, Lom and Abdal); and, on the other hand, groups such as Travellers, Yenish, and the populations designated under the administrative term “Gens du voyage”, as well as persons who identify themselves as Gypsies.