CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 juin 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 30 June 2016   SECOND SECTION Application no. 43097/15 Hasan Baki GÜLCAN against Turkey lodged on 19 August 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the room confinement imposed on the applicant by his military superiors as a disciplinary measure (see Tengilimoğlu and Others v. Turkey , nos. 26938/08, 41039/09, 66328/09 and 66451/09, 5   June 2012).   QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Having regard to the room confinement imposed on the applicant on 11   December 2012 as a disciplinary penalty, and to the decision of the Constitutional Court dated 12 March 2015 which found a violation without awarding any compensation, has there been a breach of Article 5 § 1 (a) of the Convention (see Tengilimoğlu and Others v. Turkey , nos.   26938/08, 41039/09, 66328/09 and 66451/09, 5 June 2012)?