CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 août 2016
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-166860
- Date
- 30 août 2016
- Publication
- 30 août 2016
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s701081D1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:left } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s8578A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:11.6pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside }   Communicated on 30 August 2016   THIRD SECTION Application no. 48136/15 Roman Dmitriyevich TRUBNIKOV against Russia and 4 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications are cases from Russian inmates concerning the quality of their medical treatment in detention (akin to Reshetnyak v.   Russia , no.   56027/10, 8 January 2013; Koryak v. Russia , no.   24677/10, 13   November 2012 and many others). For additional details see Appendix. One of the applicants ( case no. 48136/15 ) raised an additional complaint related to inadequate conditions of detention under Article 3 of the Convention akin to Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012. COMMON QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     The Government are requested to produce a typed copy of the applicants’ complete medical records drawn up after their arrest, and, if available, copies of expert reports and secondary opinions from medical specialists assessing the applicants’ health, the quality of the treatment afforded to them during the detention and laying down medical procedures which should have been or should be performed to maintain their health.   2.     Taking into account the applicants’ medical history, have the authorities met their obligation to ensure that that their health and well-being are being adequately secured by, among other things, providing them with the requisite medical assistance (see McGlinchey and Others v. the United Kingdom , no. 50390/99, § 46, ECHR 2003-V), as required by Article 3 of the Convention, in the present case? QUESTIONS in respect of individual applications Application no.   48136/15 Trubnikov v. Russia Did the material conditions of the applicant’s detention, in particular the personal space available in the cell and the sanitary conditions, amount to inhuman or degrading treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention ( Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10   January 2012)?       APPENDIX No. App. No. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Diagnosis/illnesses complained about Major flaws in the medical treatment complained about Place and period of detention   48136/15 12/11/2015 Roman Dmitriyevich TRUBNIKOV 01/09/1991 Tumor of the inguinal region, headaches etc. Intolerance to prescribed drugs; medical treatment refused; no medical tests performed IZ-47/1 St Petersburg 20 June 2014-pending   53122/15 11/11/2015 Valeriy Petrovich POCHKAYENKO 10/07/1957 Bechterew’s disease, end-stage, first-degree disability; atherosclerosis, ischemic illness, etc. No treatment provided, no medical specialists, no painkillers SIZO-1 Amur Region, September 2013 – August 2015; Colony no. 7 Zabaykalsk Region, August 2015 – pending     1484/16 29/12/2015 Aleksandr Sergeyevich IZYUROV 07/06/1956 Kidney cancer (IV stage), spreading; first degree disability No adequate and timely diagnostic tests and medical treatment; painkillers prescribed are ineffective IK-24 Azanka Sverdlovsk Region 30 June 2009 – pending   10903/16 11/02/2016 Anna Olegovna VOROBYEVA 12/08/1983 Tuberculosis, anemia, heart failure, cachexia, gastritis; second-degree disability. No adequate treatment of tuberculosis; intolerance to prescribed drugs IZ-1 Kurgan; LIU-3 Kurgan 27 September 2015 – pending   16504/16 20/02/2016 Aleksey Viktorovich KUKHARCHUK 13/12/1981 Growing liver lumps (apparently echinococcosis) developed while in detention. Prescribed drugs not given; no assistance provided to get on the waiting list for liver transplant IZ-5, Kansk, 16 April 2006 to February 2008; IK-16, Gromadsk, February 2008 to June 2009; KTB-1, Krasnoyarsk, June to November 2009; LIU-32, Minusinsk, November 2009 to March 2011; KTB-1, Krasnoyarsk, March 2011 to June 2011; LIU-35, Startsevo, June 2011 to September 2014; IK-17, Krasnoyarsk, September 2014 and pending.            Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 30 août 2016
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-166860
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel