CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 août 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 16 June 2015 and 30 August 2016   FOURTH SECTION Application no 36249/14 Genrik LISOVSKIJ against Lithuania lodged on 24 April 2014     The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Did the competent domestic authorities display special diligence in the conduct of the criminal proceedings against the applicant during the period of his detention on remand (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 153, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV; Arutyunyan v. Russia , no. 48977/09, § 109, 10 January 2012; and Dervishi v. Croatia , no. 67341/10, §§ 139-144, 25 September 2012)?