CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 12 septembre 2016
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-167306
- Date
- 12 septembre 2016
- Publication
- 12 septembre 2016
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 12 September 2016   FIRST SECTION Application no. 22350/13 Alessandro SALLUSTI against Italy lodged on 18 March 2013   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a journalist and, at the material time, he was the director of the newspaper Libero . The application concerns his criminal conviction for defamation through the press ( diffamazione a mezzo stampa ) and for failure to conduct supervision of the content of the publication ( omesso controllo sul contenuto dell’articolo diffamatorio ).   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, and in particular of his right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention? In particular - considering that the applicant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment, coupled with the payment of a fine and the payment of compensation - were the sanctions imposed proportionate in their nature and severity (see, among many authorities, Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v. Romania [GC], no.   33348/96, ECHR 2004 ‑ XI and Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan , no. 40984/07, 22   April 2010)? Information Sought The Government are invited to provide information on the current status of legislative proposals related to sentencing in the sphere of defamation, with particular reference to Draft Law n. 1119-B.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 12 septembre 2016
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-167306
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel