CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 8 novembre 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left }   Communicated on 8 November 2016   THIRD SECTION Application no 61559/16 A.A. and Others against Sweden lodged on 20 October 2016 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants are an Afghan family consisting of a mother and four adult daughters, who arrived in Sweden and applied for asylum in 2011. They submitted that if they were to be deported to Afghanistan, where they lack a male network, they would risk being killed or face treatment in contravention of Article 3. Their applications were rejected by the Migration Agency and, upon appeal, by the migration courts.     COMPLAINT   The applicants complain under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention that, if they were to be deported to Afghanistan, where they lack a male network, they would risk being killed or face treatment in contravention of Article 3. QUESTION In the light of the applicants’ claims and the documents which have been submitted, would they face a risk of being subjected to treatment in breach of Articles 2 or 3 of the Convention if the deportation order were enforced?