CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 18 janvier 2017

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s74384AE5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.4pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)19 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty-six cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 January 2017 at the 1275 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application No. Case Date of the decision 33722/05 AKAR 13/09/2011 51829/09 AKBAS AND OTHERS 13/09/2011 50010/10 İsmail Ufuk AKKAYA 16/09/2014 1934/05 ALGUL 08/03/2011 31866/09 ALTINTAS AND KUTLU 15/02/2011 18506/06 ASLAN 13/09/2011 44963/08 AYDIN AND OTHERS 08/02/2011 36418/06 AYTEN AND AYKUT 13/09/2011 17362/07 BILGEN 08/03/2011 27816/09 BUNUL 08/03/2011 33289/07 COKAY 13/09/2011 4051/06 DEMIRKOL 08/02/2011 16205/04 GORPE 13/09/2011 13267/07 KALGI AND OTHERS 08/03/2011 21269/07 KIZANLIK AND OTHERS 24/05/2011 40780/07 MELEKOGLU AND OTHERS 13/09/2011 19501/07 OKTEM AND OTHERS 30/08/2011 38353/06 OZBINGOLLU 08/03/2011 61621/08 OZTURK TURKER AND OTHERS 08/03/2011 17280/05 SAKMAK 08/03/2011 13865/10 SEYHAN 18/10/2011 44594/08 SOKUK 13/09/2011 40507/09 TEZEL 08/03/2011 5438/09 TUGAL 08/03/2011 36683/09 YANMIS AND ZORLU 08/03/2011 34350/06 YEKSATAN AND OTHERS 13/09/2011   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.