CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 10 janvier 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 10 January 2017 and 1 March 2017   THIRD SECTION Application no 2592/17 R.A. against Russia lodged on 9 January 2017     The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Did the length of the appeal proceedings in Moscow Regional Court, by which the applicant sought to challenge the lawfulness of his detention ordered by the Domodedovskiy Town Court on 28 July 2016, comply with the “speed” requirement of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention?