CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 8 février 2017

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s74384AE5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.4pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)54 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights 24 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 February 2017 at the 1277 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Date of the decision 24640/06 Habibe AÇIL 12/01/2016 23126/06 Özgür AĞDAŞ 15/03/2016 62087/12 Ömer AKKAN 19/05/2015 66505/09 Muradiye ATAY 12/01/2016 70941/10 Cengiz AYAR 15/03/2016 38683/11 Fatih Hür BEKTAŞ 01/03/2016 16857/12 Hayrettin BEŞTAŞ and Beşir BARAN 17/05/2016 31139/10 Elvan BİLİCİ AND 69 OTHER APPLICATIONS 08/12/2015 40623/11 Umut ÇATAL 12/01/2016 56702/10 Hasan DENİZ AND 12 OTHER APPLICATIONS 08/12/2015 5429/12 Tolga EYİBİL 12/01/2016 26457/12 Çilem İLASLAN 02/09//2014 39978/07 Cahit İLBOĞA AND 3 OTHER APPLICATIONS 14/06/2016 63666/09 KINALIOĞLU 15/10/2013 5070/12 Abdullah KÖÇER 15/03/2016 50114/09 MADAK 26/03/2013 38924/11 Ali MERCAN 14/06/2016 26388/05 MURAT YILMAZ 10/01/2012 63447/12 Cemal NAYIR 09/02/2016 19053/09 ÖZDEMİR 26/03/2013 28543/11 Olcay ŞAHİN 15/03/2016 55125/11 Servet ŞİMŞEK 08/12/2015 58458/10 Hasan Erim TOPRAK 15/03/2016 41585/10 Oğuz ZENGİN 08/12/2015   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.