CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 26 avril 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA56BACAB { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .s13783063 { width:6.24pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3537C2D6 { font-weight:normal } Communicated on 26 April 2017   FIRST SECTION Application no. 78005/11 Athanasia MALLIAKOU and others against Greece lodged on 9 December 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the revocation of the applicants’ permission to exploit a quarry and the qualification of the largest part of their land as a zone of absolute protection in which any construction is forbidden in view of protection of historic monuments. The applicants complain that the above-mentioned acts resulted in deprivation of their property for which they did not receive any compensation as the domestic courts considered that their land was primarily destined for agricultural and stock-breeding activities, which were not impeded. The applicants also complain about the length of the domestic proceedings, which lasted in total eleven years and about the lack of an effective domestic remedy in respect of their complaint about the length of the proceedings. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the revocation of the applicants’ permission to exploit a quarry and the qualification of the largest part of their land as a zone of absolute protection amount to an interference with their peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1? If so, was that interference subject to the conditions provided for by law for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? Did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants, having regard to the fact that the remaining part of their land was reduced to less than 4,000 sq. m, i.e. below the statutory minimum surface set for building land?   2. Was the length of the proceedings instituted by the applicants on 2   August 2000 in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention?   3.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint about the length of proceedings under Article 6 § 1, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?   APPENDIX         Athanasia MALLIAKOU is a Greek national who was born in 1944, lives in Amfissa     Efthymia BECHLIVANOPOULOU is a Greek national who was born in 1962, lives in Itea     Athanasios KARAGEORGOS is a Greek national who was born in 1959, lives in Amfissa     Athanasios KARAGEORGOS is a Greek national who was born in 1961, lives in Nea Smyrni     Evaggelos KARAGEORGOS is a Greek national who was born in 1961, lives in Amfissa     Konstantinos KARAGEORGOS is a Greek national who was born in 1963, lives in Amfissa     Panagiotis KARAGEORGOS is a Greek national who was born in 1969, lives in Amfissa     Dimitra KARAGEORGOU is a Greek national who was born in 1939, lives in Monastira Doridos     Eleni KARAGEORGOU is a Greek national who was born in 1939, lives in Amfissa Zoï KARAGEORGOU is a Greek national who was born in 1932, lives in Amfissa Asimakis KOKKINOS is a Greek national who was born in 1974, lives in Amfissa