CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 avril 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 24 April 2017   THIRD SECTION Application no. 73911/16 Maria Cristina LARRAÑAGA ARANDO against Spain and 5 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the Audiencia Nacional’s refusal to increase the applicants’ compensation for their relatives’ deaths as a result of a terrorist attack, on the ground that those relatives were also terrorists within the meaning of Article 8 § 2 of the Council of Europe Convention on the compensation of victims of violent crimes of 24 November 1983 and Article   3bis § 2 of law 29/2011, of 22 September 2011, on comprehensive recognition and protection of victims of terrorism. This was determined in the absence of a previous criminal conviction.   QUESTION tO THE PARTIES In the absence of a previous criminal conviction, were the reasons given by the Audiencia Nacional ’s judgments for refusing to increase the applicants’ compensation compatible with the principle of presumption of innocence guaranteed by Article 6 § 2 of the Convention (see, by way of comparison, Tendam v. Spain , no. 25720/05, 13 July 2010) ?           No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   73911/16 29/11/2016 Maria Cristina LARRAÑAGA ARANDO 30/07/1954 Ascain Maria Jose GURRUCHAGA BASURTO   75529/16 02/12/2016 Karmele MARTINEZ AGIRRE 12/07/1948 Bilbao   Nagore OTEGI MARTINEZ 06/02/1983 Bilbao Ibon ALTUNA GOIRIZELAIA   79503/16 02/12/2016 Maria Antonia IBARGUREN ASTIGARRAGA 18/04/1932 Zestoa Iñigo IRUIN SANZ   233/17 23/12/2016 Mikel ECHANIZ MAIZTEGUI 05/03/1959 Urretxu   Xabier ECHANIZ MAIZTEGUI 28/09/1956 Urretxu Iñigo IRUIN SANZ   3086/17 20/12/2016 Ignacia LIZARRAGA ALDABURU 31/07/1920 Olazagutia Iñigo IRUIN SANZ   5155/17 26/12/2016 Maria Belen AGUILAR PEREZ 05/10/1955 Donostia   Ugaitz ELIZARAN AGUILAR 10/08/1976 Bilbao   Aitor ELIZARAN AGUILAR 30/06/1979 Donostia Iñigo IRUIN SANZ