CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 26 avril 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 26 April 2017   SECOND SECTION Application no. 33199/11 Liubomir DUDULICA against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 19 May 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application essentially concerns alleged inadequate conditions of the applicant’s detention for seventeen days (twelve of which were in Prison   No. 13). The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that the conditions of his detention amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the material conditions of the applicant’s detention in Prison No. 13 amount to inhuman or degrading treatment (see Shishanov v. the Republic of Moldova , no. 11353/06, 15 September 2015)?