CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 20 juin 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 20 June 2017   SECOND SECTION Application no. 42517/15 Murat YURDAER against Denmark lodged on 24 August 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a Turkish national, born in 1973, who entered Denmark in 1978, when he was 5 years old. He is married and has three children. They are also Turkish nationals. By a judgment, which became final on 14 April 2015, he was convicted of various drug offences, sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment, and expelled from Denmark with a life-long ban on returning.   Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention, the applicant complained that it would be in breach of the Convention to expel him from Denmark, notably since he had all his family there, and had been brought up there. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Having regard, in particular, to the length of the applicant’s stay in Denmark as well as his family situation, including the best interests and well-being of the children, would an implementation of the order to expel the applicant from Denmark be in breach of Article 8 of the Convention? (see, inter alia , Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR   2006 ‑ XII).