CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 21 juin 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 21 June 2017   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 20497/13 Balázs TÓTH against Hungary lodged on 28 May 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the prohibition of a demonstration intended to urge the President of the Republic not to sign the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law in March 2013.     QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention (see Szerdahelyi v. Hungary , no. 30385/07, 17 January 2012)?   2.     Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his Convention complaints, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?