CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 juin 2017
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-175717
- Date
- 28 juin 2017
- Publication
- 28 juin 2017
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s27A06D70 { height:49.35pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s75E70776 { height:52.9pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 28 June 2017   THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 2196/17 and 2200/17 Maksim Vasilyevich ROGOZA against Russia and Viktor Valeryevich SABLIN against Russia lodged on 10 December 2016 and 20 December 2016 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASEs The applicants, who are currently serving prison sentences in correctional colony IK-2 of Zabaykalskiy Region, allege that they are being subjected to pressure by the administration of the above facility in connection with their complaints about the conditions of their post ‑ conviction detention raised in separate applications and communicated to the respondent Government. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES In the light of the applicants’ claims and the evidence which has been submitted, has there been any hindrance by the State with the effective exercise of the applicants’ right of application, ensured by Article   34 of the Convention? In particular: (a)     Did the acting head of IK-2 of Zabaykalskiy Region Mr A.A., the head of the operative division of IK-2 of Zabaykalskiy Region Mr A.K. or any other official exercise pressure on Mr M. Rogoza to withdraw his application (no. 41822/16) to the Court? Why was Mr M. Rogoza summoned to meet with the above officials on 25   October and 26   October 2016? (b)     Did any official of IK-2 of Zabaykalskiy Region, directly or through other convicts serving their sentences in IK-2, exercise pressure on Mr   V.   Sablin to withdraw his applications (nos. 24584/15 and 40467/16) to the Court?   APPENDIX   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence     2196/17 10/12/2016 Maksim Vasilyevich ROGOZA 30/06/1985 Shara-Gorokhon   2200/17 20/12/2016 Viktor Valeryevich SABLIN 11/03/1976 Shara-Gorokhon    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 28 juin 2017
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-175717
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel